That's not beyond reason, given that The Dalek Invasion of Earth takes place in 2164. Earth was pretty damaged in that story.
Sarah Jane and K9?
- Thread starter Turtletrekker
- Start date
You can't be suggesting that the robocops, where just retooled robomen all along?
No, it's all compartmentalized because of licensing.
The Professor character turns out to have been a mad scientist who 10 years earlier had accidentally "started" whatever it was that ####ed up the world, and since then he has been simultaneously feeling guilty, and tying not to let anyone find out that he is responsible, because he'll probably be executed.
Oh, and at one point early on his time scoop sucked up is family, wife and kids, which is why he's still tinkering with it despite that that device is probably what is responsible for wasting the planet.
No, it's all compartmentalized because of licensing.
The Professor character turns out to have been a mad scientist who 10 years earlier had accidentally "started" whatever it was that ####ed up the world, and since then he has been simultaneously feeling guilty, and tying not to let anyone find out that he is responsible, because he'll probably be executed.
Oh, and at one point early on his time scoop sucked up is family, wife and kids, which is why he's still tinkering with it despite that that device is probably what is responsible for wasting the planet.
The Daleks also invaded in the 22nd century and in The Dalek Invasion Of Earth London was destroyed timey, wimey and all that.
Psst. The year 2164 is in the 22nd century.
The Daleks also invaded in the 22nd century and in The Dalek Invasion Of Earth London was destroyed timey, wimey and all that.
I'm just pointing out that there's still enough left of the 22nd century after 2164 to develop the kind of setting this other series is set in.
I haven't seen it, and don't really care that much. But The Dalek Invasion of Earth is one of my favorite First Doctor stories.
Psst. The year 2164 is in the 22nd century.
The Daleks also invaded in the 22nd century and in The Dalek Invasion Of Earth London was destroyed timey, wimey and all that.
I'm just pointing out that there's still enough left of the 22nd century after 2164 to develop the kind of setting this other series is set in.
I haven't seen it, and don't really care that much. But The Dalek Invasion of Earth is one of my favorite First Doctor stories.
Well I was talking about the other Dalek invasion of earth in the 23nd century in The Day Of The Daleks, teh one that was time looped out. And in any event K9 fought teenaged mutant turtles rip offs in his first ep.
1971 + 200 = 2171.
(Although none of the numbers used in the above equations are all that precise.)
I took this...
...To mean that they stopped the Doctor stopping them at the end of the serial in 1964.
They didn't reinvade later later on.
They altered history, reinvading at the same time, so that they never lost.
The Daleks could have knocked the Doctor off course so that he never arrived when he did, or they could have showed up with reinforcements an hour after the TARDIS left, or they could have always confidence tricked One into believing that their defeat in Dalek Invasion of the Earth was real when they had really just been play acting till he buggered off... Like at the end of the Sting, or the Sting II. The mark runs off assuming black is white and up is down and has no desire to confirm his or her facts.
Or they could have just killed him, Ian, Susan and Barbara.
Also in Audio land, Peri and 6 arrived in the England countryside last month, where they were talking to the weirdo's acting like it was mostly the 17th century all over again involved in a public stoning, when somebugger revealed to the Timelord the date: 2162.
"Let's go Peri, lets go now."
"What's the matter Doctor, shouldn't we help these people?"
"No we shouldn't. We shouldn't be here at all, and we really must be going."
Last edited:
Ahem. Are you forgetting Lucie Miller's last story, Guy?
Possibly?
That was the 2180s or 2190s?
Did he get pissed off with the crummy results from the final accounting and try to Timelord Victorious the original invasion?
Accidentally making changes by blundering about is different than swooping in with a scalpel and making select CRIMINAL changes.
But that was the Monks game. He thought that one could piss on the web of time without there being consequences, or at least unforeseeable/unweatherable consequences.
If the Monk can change time, then so can the Doctor.
If he wants to.
But he doesn't want to... Most of the time.
Or are you meaning that there was a second Dalek invasion in either the 21st or 22nd century?
That all depends on how long Susan waited till she had children doesn't it?
Even though, she may have had centuries until her biological clock started ticking so loudly, David, her husband, had been breathing poison and radiation daily for 7 years before he met the woman he would marry.
It's a miracle he wasn't sterile, and a double miracle if he lived to 2170.
Oh?
Susan willed herself to age faster so that first her husband would not seen like a paedophile creep, then so that bystanders would not assume that she was the babysitter, or the psycho babysitter that had stolen someone elses children, or eventually her sons lover.
Forced maturity seems nicer than periodically being asked how your child is as a lover by persons who misunderstand the relationship you two have.
That was the 2180s or 2190s?
Did he get pissed off with the crummy results from the final accounting and try to Timelord Victorious the original invasion?
Accidentally making changes by blundering about is different than swooping in with a scalpel and making select CRIMINAL changes.
But that was the Monks game. He thought that one could piss on the web of time without there being consequences, or at least unforeseeable/unweatherable consequences.
If the Monk can change time, then so can the Doctor.
If he wants to.
But he doesn't want to... Most of the time.
Or are you meaning that there was a second Dalek invasion in either the 21st or 22nd century?
That all depends on how long Susan waited till she had children doesn't it?
Even though, she may have had centuries until her biological clock started ticking so loudly, David, her husband, had been breathing poison and radiation daily for 7 years before he met the woman he would marry.
It's a miracle he wasn't sterile, and a double miracle if he lived to 2170.
Oh?
Susan willed herself to age faster so that first her husband would not seen like a paedophile creep, then so that bystanders would not assume that she was the babysitter, or the psycho babysitter that had stolen someone elses children, or eventually her sons lover.
Forced maturity seems nicer than periodically being asked how your child is as a lover by persons who misunderstand the relationship you two have.
Last edited:
