The guild released a summary of the deal:
https://deadline.com/2023/11/sag-aftra-deal-summary-released-read-it-1235600852/
I probably would have recommended a rejection of the deal and a continuation of the strike. Actors really need a significant cut of over-all streaming revenue to replace syndication residuals, and the AI protections here seem a bit weak.
I was suspicious when the guild was saying that they were miles apart, then the AMPTP set its 5 p.m. deadline, and then later that same day suddenly everything was hunky-dory and SAG-AFTRA was calling it "historic." That, and the cheery way execs seemed to be like, "Teehee, SAG-AFTRA practically got everything they asked for!" just feels like they pulled a sneaky one.
Justine Bateman has a pretty good thread on Twitter about how this is a terrible deal for the union when it comes to AI. In short, a lot of actors got sold out.
Sounds like maybe the union membership should reject the deal and force a resumption of negotiations.
Perhaps...It would be a difficult P.R. move by the union membership, though, and you would need some mechanism to change union negotiators (as it would destroy the credibility of the current team).
Honestly SAG should hire the WGA's negotiating team. They did a better job, it seems.
The WGA settled for similar streaming residual scraps to SAG-AFTRA's deal. I'm not sure they're the best example, though they did get a number of wins elsewhere in the contract.
I was definitely under the impression that the WGA got a better deal there, but I haven't had the time to read all the details. Isn't the biggest problem with the SAG terms the stuff about A.I. and actors' likenesses though?
Unfortunately, their contributions are often unrecognized and go unnoticed.Definitely reflects comments John DiMaggio (Bender on Futurama) was making a couple years ago about voice actors being on the bottom of the acting food chain.
Damnit, what the fuck?!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.