Actually, no.Dude, I can say whatever the hell I want here.
Getting snippy when someone objects to your lack of substantiation doesn't help things, FleetLord.This forum is for people to express there opinions and knowledge, If you don't like what I have to say then don't reply to my posts unless your a moderator. Selective Ignorance can be you friend here.
Braga was still contributing to the show, no question. But it was mostly from home and he was not at the studio that much there was a reason for that beyond him trying to develop other projects like Threshold. Braga is a good writer but sometime his 'vices' can cause issues. But hey, everyone is human, no one is perfect.
Do you have any proof other than rumour? Is this something you simply made up? I am no fan of Braga, but it is pretty low to keep making these slimy comments (this is the second time) in this thread without providing any proof.
What confuses me is why they couldn't have shopped the show somewhere else??
From what I remember, it had a lot to do with production costs. The only other network that dabbles in sci-fi is FOX, which is notoriously trigger happy in cancelation (O HI THAR, Family Guy!). Cable networks are a bit safer, but usually don't bring in the revenue to support a show that at it's very cheapest ran 1.2 million bucks an episode.What confuses me is why they couldn't have shopped the show somewhere else??
Eccleston and Bakula chewing scenery together. Could have been interesting...back in 2004, a Doctor Who/Star Trek crossover was seriously on their list of plans, until Enterprise was axed.
What confuses me is why they couldn't have shopped the show somewhere else??
I love this post.Those in control wanted it dead.
Basically, fans should find Les Moonves' house, drag him out of his bed in the middle of the night and beat him with tire irons.
I meant that metaphorically.
I mean, it doesn't have to be tire irons. Baseball bats and two-by-fours would do.![]()
UPN didn't do enough to promote or support the show. They didn't know what kind of network they wanted to be and Star Trek suffered as a result.
I didn't care for ENT for a long time. But, as always for me, after it was off the air I got into it. I now wish it had continued, just so we would have more trek. Now that I hear it was most likely becuase one person at CBS didn't like trek, that is...just...crazy.
UPN didn't do enough to promote or support the show. They didn't know what kind of network they wanted to be and Star Trek suffered as a result.
What confuses me is why they couldn't have shopped the show somewhere else??
What confuses me is why they couldn't have shopped the show somewhere else??
Those in control wanted it dead.
Basically, fans should find Les Moonves' house, drag him out of his bed in the middle of the night and beat him with tire irons.
I meant that metaphorically.
I mean, it doesn't have to be tire irons. Baseball bats and two-by-fours would do.![]()
You're only half correct. The level of network tampering was obvious. It affected the quality of ENT,VOY, and Twilight Zone. It also affected Jake 2.0 and their lack of focus caused us to lose promising shows like Nowhere Man, Seven Days and Legend for the sake of having the WWF and America's Top Model.UPN didn't do enough to promote or support the show. They didn't know what kind of network they wanted to be and Star Trek suffered as a result.
No it didn't. ENTERPRISE didn't fail because of lack of PR. The so called base, meaning "us", consists of more than 2 million people. It failed because even the base didn't even watch it; it failed because it just wasn't percieved to be that good by TREK fans AND by the general public. Kind of like that Nemesis failure, which some keep attributing to bad PR or being released so close the last RING movie. No...NEMESIS would have bombed no matter when it had been released; it just wasnt percieved to be that good either..just like Enterprise.
Rob
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.