• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

S.J. Clarkson To Direct Next Star Trek Movie, First Female Director in (Movie) Franchise’s History

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well you just said it's a looming box office disappointment.

There is a big difference between a sure-fire loser (which so far has only been ST:Nemesis) and a looming disappointment (which is the current trajectory of the Kelvin timeline movie franchise). Different words mean different things. Words have... meanings. You know?
 
I'm always nervous when they give a big budget film to someone who hasn't directed beyond TV before, but the team in place is probably a well-oiled machine at this point, so she should be fine. I haven't seen anything she's done besides Life on Mars. That was good.
 
Still, they're not going to back a sure-fire loser.

Or at least, one would very much hope not.
Star Trek is usually profitable but it's rarely blockbuster. I agree they need to make a less expensive film and adjust expectations, because it's never going to do Star Wars numbers.
 
This is disappointing, looking at her IMDB it smacks of Nemesis all over again. Just throwing the franchise to whoever has sucked enough dicks and shook the right hands. Hopefully the script is good at least, I'd be more optimistic if Pegg came back. I mean at the very least I guess JJ Abrams is the decision maker on this rather than what happened with the TNG movies.
 
Jayla replacing Chekov makes the most sense.

1. She was a new likable character that is not restrained by previous canon.
2. She's a badass.
3. It would add yet another female lead to the crew which is all the rage in Hollywood these days.
4. Most fans enjoyed her scenes.

And we don't need another human character
 
This is disappointing, looking at her IMDB it smacks of Nemesis all over again. Just throwing the franchise to whoever has sucked enough dicks and shook the right hands.

Can we not reduce a professional to dick sucking?

IIRC most of the films did not have experienced film directors - Nimoy, Shatner, Carson, Frakes. Nick Meyer had only directed Time After Time and was best known as a writer.
 
This is disappointing, looking at her IMDB it smacks of Nemesis all over again. Just throwing the franchise to whoever has sucked enough dicks and shook the right hands. Hopefully the script is good at least, I'd be more optimistic if Pegg came back. I mean at the very least I guess JJ Abrams is the decision maker on this rather than what happened with the TNG movies.
That's an extremely poor and insulting choice of words for the first woman getting a chance to direct a Star Trek film, not to mention one who is a professional with a proven track record of television and streaming service directorial work. And I have a hard time believing it was unintentional or that you couldn't work out how problematic sounding that would be well in advance of posting it.

Therefore, you have received an Infraction for trolling. Comments to PM. Please don't post that kind of thing again.
 
trying to think of first time movie directors from TV. Obviously theres the Trek ones Nimoy, Shat, Carson, Frakes and the biggest one is Spielberg of course.. but more recent the only one who went from popular tv shows to a really huge movie that comes to mind is Alan Taylor (GOT, BBad to Thor 2, T5) and JJ of course (Lost-MI3)
 
Is it really that surprising to see a TV director getting their first break with a major feature film? That seems to be an increasingly common practice these days, to give major features to TV directors with only limited feature experience, if any. And of course, the only way to break the glass ceiling and improve the gender and racial balance among feature directors is to bring in a lot of new people from TV (where there's already a fairly large talent pool of female and ethnically diverse directors).

Personally, I prefer it when film directors have TV experience. Too many movie directors in the past generation or so have come from commercials or music videos and have been trained to think that visuals and spectacle matter more than story and character, that creating brief, striking moments is more important than telling a coherent narrative. And so we get a ton of films that are visually amazing and beautifully made but fall apart on a story and character level. TV, by contrast, is a writer-driven medium that pretty much has to be more about story and character than action and spectacle, and so I have more faith in a TV director to make a movie that holds together on those more fundamental levels.
 
trying to think of first time movie directors from TV. Obviously theres the Trek ones Nimoy, Shat, Carson, Frakes and the biggest one is Spielberg of course.. but more recent the only one who went from popular tv shows to a really huge movie that comes to mind is Alan Taylor (GOT, BBad to Thor 2, T5) and JJ of course (Lost-MI3)
Taika Waititi did Flight of the Conchords and vaulted into movies pretty rapidly (directed Thor Ragnarok recently, will be doing What We Do in the Shadows sequel with Doug Jones soon, maybe?). John Krasinski may be a more famous case, lately. I'm sure there's others but they just don't come to mind right now.
 
Wow. Didn't expect to see news like this when I woke up this morning.

I never liked the idea of Star Trek 4 involving Kirk's dad, but we'll see how it goes.

I've very intrigued by the selection of Clarkson. The cynic in me says it's a money saving move, and a way of generating publicity "first female director." Having said that, I like the idea of having an up and coming director that wants to prove herself. This franchise needs new blood.

Just please don't let this be another big budget action schlock fest.
 
This is wonderful news. Clarkson is an excellent director. And I'd like to point something out here:

She has put in more hours behind the camera than Meyer, Nimoy, Shatner, Frakes, and Baird had when they directed their first films combined. And Carson hadn't directed a feature film either.

And one could easily argue that modern streaming series are way more cinematic in nature than either TV movies of the late 70s or syndicated TV of the 90s.

That said, I would have really loved to see the first woman Trek film director be Dawson. I think she's equally as talented and it would have been much more fitting the tradition of the franchise. But that's a really minor gripe.
 
S.J. Clarkson is a television director with no feature film experience, but she has shot multiple episodes of several prestigious and big-budget television shows in addition to a wide variety of other types of programming. There's nothing in her filmography that screams "Trek!" to me, but there wasn't in Justin Lin's either, and I think he got the cast interactions even better than Abrams did -- Lin's film truly felt like an episode of Star Trek, and it was fun to have a Trek film like that. In many ways, I thought it was the closest to a TOS episode of any of the films to date (both Prime and Kelvin universes).

So I think the idea of bringing a television director on board, someone who is used to working with an already-established cast, who knows how to bring in a project on time and on budget, is a good thing. I think it also speaks to the new Paramount head honcho understanding that the allure to Trek is Trek, and that spending money on a "brand name" director isn't going to change that equation.

I think the last regime at Paramount was hoping that if they just kept saying "Justin Lin! Fast & Furious!" over and over, that all of the F&F fans would come out for Trek, and it obviously didn't work that way. But that was never going to happen in the first place. So good on Paramount for getting that. (I think Lin did a fantastic job, and would have happily welcomed him back, but I don't think their expectations for what he'd bring in terms of audience were realistic.)

I also think this speaks to Paramount wanting to get this done in a timely fashion, and finally understanding that leaving the property dormant for so long between adventures isn't good.

So this all has me feeling very optimistic today. They're starting production two years too late, but at least they're going to start.
 
I've very intrigued by the selection of Clarkson. The cynic in me says it's a money saving move,
I'd hope they wouldn't consider paying her less than Justin Lin for example.

and a way of generating publicity "first female director."

Do most people care who the director is, unless it's a Spielberg, Tarantino, Nolan type? I can't see it figuring much into the marketing plan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top