What a load. Are we actually still suggesting the trite line "Capaldi would've been better without series 8 and 9" when those very series are among the show's best? And of course you would welcome the Chibster bullshit as a "welcome reset" because all Chibster really had to offer, besides the ugliest looking TARDIS console room, was more boring, mystery defying lore. But if you weren't negatively disposes against the Hybrid you'd realize that Hell Bent is one of the greatest DW stories ever, as it makes fun of lore revelations and actually focuses on what the show is really all about: The Doctor, and his companion.
I was reading the thread on "
How Would You End Doctor Who for Good," and after sitting with it and thinking for ten, fifteen minutes, I decided, with both reluctance and certainty, that "The Big Bang" -- yes, the finale to Series 5 -- was the perfect ending for
Doctor Who. Oh, I'd miss a lot that came after it, like Capaldi, like "Day of the Doctor," but had
Doctor Who ended with Amy remembering the Doctor back into existence, I would have been content. And then maybe around now, the BBC would have found some new producer to give the concept a refresh and a new life.
I'm not Steve, but yes, I think Capaldi would have better off without Series 8 or 9. And Smith would have been better off without Series 6 and 7. That's not to say that there aren't good moments in those series, because there are, and I would miss them. I'd miss Danny Pink. I would miss "The Name of the Doctor." But these series are less than the sum of their parts. Back in 2013,
The Atlantic argued that the wrong man was leaving in "The Time of the Doctor" -- Smith instead of Moffat -- and I can't disagree. I think of the argument I've made about Moftis' (Gatfat's?)
Sherlock a number of times -- it would have been a brilliant one-series-and-done, I'd think of what might have been had it gone only two series, but after three I no longer cared, and after four any affection I might have had burned on a pyre. Moffat can make a great first album, and after that is a series of difficult second albums, and thirds, and fourths....
I'm slagging on Moffat here, and in cutting off
Doctor Who with "The Big Bang," I'd also get rid of Chibnall and Whittaker. I would miss the hell of Whittaker, not because I find her attractive (which I do and have), but because she is genuinely
weird, and even if her scripts were poor she was always, effortlessly Doctor-ish. I think I get what Chibnall was going for -- his era feels very CW, very Berlantiverse to me and targetted at that audience -- and it generally works for me in that way, but I can see how that wouldn't work for a lot of people.
No, we're suggesting Capaldi would have been better if Moffat had written him better, and not as an asshole. The Ninth Doctor's attitude towards Mickey was bad enough. Twelve's attitude towards Danny Pink was worse. Twelve has a few personality transplants after that, but they feel like abrupt changes rather than growth or development.
Moffat seems to have conceived of the twelfth Doctor as the New Adventures Doctor, a manipulative and dangerous asshole. (Series 8 makes a ton of sense viewed through the NA prism.) Capaldi seems to have conceived of the twelfth Doctor as "Matt Smith but old," and eventually Capaldi was able to bring Moffat around, but it took time.
It was when [Capaldi] took over the ratings started to plunge. In particular people seem to have blanked out just how shockingly bad the ratings for his last series were.
For a while, Titan's
Doctor Who ongoing comics -- Ten, Eleven, and Twelve -- were all selling 10k a month. Then they did the
Four Doctors crossover in 2015, which sold 15k an issue, and after that sales crashed.
I feel like something happened in 2015, like maybe the long hangover from the 50th-Anniversary finally dissipated, and
Doctor Who has never recovered its popularity.