It's always a good idea to have a spare Doctor in your back pocket, particularly one so popular!Or they could just bring Fourteen back again, this seems like exactly the kind of situation they kept him around for.
I don't really want the show to end like this. Bring in a relatively big name, have a clear objective to produce 3 seasons as a final run for the show and attempt to go out on a high.
Nothing lasts forever, but at least make the ending memorable.
There is that risk.And be prepared to backtrack on it being the end of the show if it suddenly gets super popular again![]()
Anyhoo, moving on. Next week looks a bit glorious, if likely to upset the Reform crowd regarding diversity in BBC casting
Is that ACTUALLY going to be a Metebelis 3 spider? And will the episode come with a trigger warning for arachnophobia? Did the Jodie ep with the giant spiders have one or was being titled Arachnids in the UK considered enough?
I suggested this before with Jodie, but it would work here as well. Have a two Doctor story with Jo Martin (Division era) and the current incumbent, and structure the story in such a way that the audience leaves with Martin, so it becomes a narrative passing of the torch. The "incumbent" is still out there, open-ended, and we could return to that Doctor whenever, but for now, the show will rattle around with Jo Martin in the past.I like the (wild) rumors that have Jo Martin as the next Doctor.![]()
I like that - to a point, obviously (I'm not fond of that aspect, of course). But yeah, why not have an interim Doctor while the main Doctor actor can have a career and pop back in when he can?I suggested this before with Jodie, but it would work here as well. Have a two Doctor story with Jo Martin (Division era) and the current incumbent, and structure the story in such a way that the audience leaves with Martin, so it becomes a narrative passing of the torch. The "incumbent" is still out there, open-ended, and we could return to that Doctor whenever, but for now, the show will rattle around with Jo Martin in the past.
I suggested this before with Jodie, but it would work here as well. Have a two Doctor story with Jo Martin (Division era) and the current incumbent, and structure the story in such a way that the audience leaves with Martin, so it becomes a narrative passing of the torch. The "incumbent" is still out there, open-ended, and we could return to that Doctor whenever, but for now, the show will rattle around with Jo Martin in the past.
I love the idea of more Jo Martin, my only issue with this is that her Division era self is a very different kind of Doctor, and not just in a "this version of me is a bit grumpier/scattier/colder than the last one" kind of way.I suggested this before with Jodie, but it would work here as well. Have a two Doctor story with Jo Martin (Division era) and the current incumbent, and structure the story in such a way that the audience leaves with Martin, so it becomes a narrative passing of the torch. The "incumbent" is still out there, open-ended, and we could return to that Doctor whenever, but for now, the show will rattle around with Jo Martin in the past.
My only issue with that option is, what happens if the interim Doctor proves way more popular than the incumbent Doctor!I like that - to a point, obviously (I'm not fond of that aspect, of course). But yeah, why not have an interim Doctor while the main Doctor actor can have a career and pop back in when he can?
I suggested the same could've been done with Capaldi, when his gap year could've been used to have Moffat-written McGann era specials.
The main issue there is the gap years, contrary to popular belief, are not done because the actor playing the Doctor wants to do other things, but because of the showrunner. For example, the 2009 gap year did not happen because of Tennant's Shakespeare thing, but rather Tennant pursued the Shakespeare gig because he knew Doctor Who would be taking a break in 2009. RTD made the decision to take 2009 off in 2006 and Tennant was informed around that time as well. Which is why bringing Paul McGann back for specials or some other interim Doctor wasn't a practical option then.I like that - to a point, obviously (I'm not fond of that aspect, of course). But yeah, why not have an interim Doctor while the main Doctor actor can have a career and pop back in when he can?
I suggested the same could've been done with Capaldi, when his gap year could've been used to have Moffat-written McGann era specials.
The main issue there is the gap years, contrary to popular belief, are not done because the actor playing the Doctor wants to do other things, but because of the showrunner. For example, the 2009 gap year did not happen because of Tennant's Shakespeare thing, but rather Tennant pursued the Shakespeare gig because he knew Doctor Who would be taking a break in 2009. RTD made the decision to take 2009 off in 2006 and Tennant was informed around that time as well. Which is why bringing Paul McGann back for specials or some other interim Doctor wasn't a practical option then.
Likewise, Capaldi's gap year came as a by-product of Moffat preparing to leave in 2015, but by the time BBC convinced him to stay on for one more season, there wasn't enough time to get anything on the air in 2016. So likewise, "Moffat written McGann era specials" could not have happened under those circumstances either.
Agreed 100%. As much as I adore Tennant, he should be used sparingly (i.e. anniversaries).I really hope they don't do that again. I like Tennant, both as an actor and as the Doctor, but we're already perilously close to a scenario where it feels like the show can't be successful without Tennant in the role.
If they were to even consider this, however, then I think they need to go all in. No piddling three specials, if he's the Doctor then I'd want him to commit to doing two series as a minimum. I can't see him doing this however.
Oh, I like the idea of bringing a previous companion actor as The Doctor. Of course, I would prefer it to be one of the classic companions but that's unlikely for a variety of reasons, from bankability (sadly) to workload. I would love to see Catherine, Karen, or Jenna in that role. Hell, I'd be curious to even see Billie in the role, speaking as someone who has a lot of issues with Rose but I don't think Billie is one of them.Other than maybe doing the old face thing again but with Smith (if he'd do it) then the only other quick win would be a returning companion, but I think that'd only work with Rose, Donna, Amy or Clara and frankly I can't see any of those wanting to come back, unless you went nuts and had the Doctor regenerate into Billie or Jenna (I think it'd be funny to see Piper looking in the mirror and going "Oh come on!")
Or the BBC put it on an extended hiatus again. Let's be honest, the original series only lasted 26 years and we're now 20 years into Nu Who (apologies to @The Nth Doctor for calling it that) so maybe it is time![]()
Honestly, Jo Martin's TARDIS interior is my favorite post-2005 console room. Like, it's not even close. I've described it before as "the Herman Zimmerman console room"; it looks like a mid-90s Star Trek set.Just let her rip. Bring back that TARDIS interior too, it was quite cozy.
I've long thought Arthur Darvill would be an incredible Doctor. Not a companion, but I think Samuel Anderson would also be intruiging.Oh, I like the idea of bringing a previous companion actor as The Doctor.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.