[
/SPOILER]
. I quite enjoyed the Romulan War books, but A few things I still don't quite understand:
Why are the Romulans so insistent on hiding their identities at all costs - wouldn't they be actively promoting the idea that they are related to Vulcans, to drive a wedge of distrust between the Coalition allies, especially the Andorians, with their already historic distrust of the Vulcans? You would think the Romulans would want to flaunt that connection in the Coalition's face, especially when they started losing the war, to destabilize the alliance - what did they have to lose near the end, by revealing the truth?
Why did Trip not reveal that he was still alive after the war - why keep up a false ID, with his family grieving his fictional death, for all his remaining days? Were people after him, or something? Did the books explain this?
Since books are not canon, according to Trek licensing, and Tucker was shown killed on screen in the final Episode of ENT, does that mean other authors can write stories going with the onscreen idea that Tucker died in 2161 (though I know some people argue the ENT-D computer mixed up the death dates, or Riker mixed it up- a bit of a stretch, in my opinion, considering all the sources computers can cross-reference...), or do future ENT writers have to abide by the events in the ENT novels by the current writer?
Why are the Romulans so insistent on hiding their identities at all costs - wouldn't they be actively promoting the idea that they are related to Vulcans, to drive a wedge of distrust between the Coalition allies, especially the Andorians, with their already historic distrust of the Vulcans? You would think the Romulans would want to flaunt that connection in the Coalition's face, especially when they started losing the war, to destabilize the alliance - what did they have to lose near the end, by revealing the truth?
Why did Trip not reveal that he was still alive after the war - why keep up a false ID, with his family grieving his fictional death, for all his remaining days? Were people after him, or something? Did the books explain this?
Since books are not canon, according to Trek licensing, and Tucker was shown killed on screen in the final Episode of ENT, does that mean other authors can write stories going with the onscreen idea that Tucker died in 2161 (though I know some people argue the ENT-D computer mixed up the death dates, or Riker mixed it up- a bit of a stretch, in my opinion, considering all the sources computers can cross-reference...), or do future ENT writers have to abide by the events in the ENT novels by the current writer?