Ah, that's why that exchange sounded familiar! Thanks for the link.
Ah, that's why that exchange sounded familiar! Thanks for the link.
Surely the New Yorker is trolling:
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/ri...is-it-time-to-abandon-the-star-wars-franchise
Highlights include:
I called BS before he got around to praising the prequels.Surely the New Yorker is trolling:
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/ri...is-it-time-to-abandon-the-star-wars-franchise
Highlights include:
With all due respect, Mr. Lucas, that's how you make a Star Wars prequel.
She's caught and desperate, what has she got to lose? Remember at this point the Senate had just been dissolved, so she's probably operating under the assumption that diplomatic immunity is still a thing and that she can throw her credentials around and still get some legal cover even after committing a crime. Plus, even if you did commit the crime, why admit to it and incriminate yourself? She might be under the impression that the courts are still a thing too and that she'll get whatever passes for a "fair" trial in the Imperial legal system.
Plus, like Relayer says, the Rebels have lots of Blockade Runners (see below). They probably immediately switched out their previous Imperial ID beacon for a new one, and then made some random jumps instead of hightailing it directly to the nearest Rebel base, hoping that the Imperials lose their track. Maybe even get some other Blockade Runners involved like a shell game. Leia likely doesn't know it was Vader who attacked them previously, so even though it's a long shot, she feigns ignorance.
![]()
I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that the comparison is being made in this case because Rogue One is also a prequel (albeit, not with much distance from the OT), like the person said?This is the second time a new STAR WARS film has been compared with the Prequel Trilogy. Why?
I dunno, why do you feel the need to bitch and complain about other people? Why is that okay, but bitching and complaining about some movies isn't?This is the second time a new STAR WARS film has been compared with the Prequel Trilogy. Why? It's becoming tiresome to me. I feel as if I'm caught up in some kind of anti-Prequel propaganda campaign. It's been eleven years since "Revenge of the Sith" and seventeen years since "The Phantom Menace". If you dislike the prequel movies . . . okay. But why do fans have to keep comparing them to any other STAR WARS movie. What is the point after a decade or so?
I'm going to give it the benefit of the doubt. I was going for A-, but I've given it an A....a couple of lines of dodgy dialogue apart, I wouldn't change a damned thing about it. It's gone a hell of a long way towards curing me of the jadedness induced by Episode VII.
I welled up towards the end - not because of the sadness, but just because of the sheer Star Warsiness of it. I was simultaneously grinning stupidly !
I'm not quite sure of the grade I'd give it yet, but it'll be high. I'll let it sink in for a while...
Pablo Hidalgo has confirmed Mustafar........
Your loss.somehow the stink of the Prequels still sort of lingers here. It's sort-of hard for me to take Vader "seriously" as a villain now in the wake of the Prequels when I don't have the nostalgia factor of the Original Trilogy to shrug it off.
Good job at equating my perfectly legitimate comparison of Rogue One as a prequel (which it is unequivocally) with unfair prequel comparisons other people may have made (but I didn't) to The Force Awakens.This is the second time a new STAR WARS film has been compared with the Prequel Trilogy. Why? It's becoming tiresome to me. I feel as if I'm caught up in some kind of anti-Prequel propaganda campaign. It's been eleven years since "Revenge of the Sith" and seventeen years since "The Phantom Menace". If you dislike the prequel movies . . . okay. But why do fans have to keep comparing them to any other STAR WARS movie. What is the point after a decade or so?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.