• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Rogue One (2016) [SW Anthology Series)

Also remember that even veteran actors often baulk at playing characters who spend most of the time behind a mask/helmet. The core of most performances take place between the nose and eyebrows and not many are confident in their abilities if that's taken away. It takes some serious talent and experience to be able to pull off what Gwendoline Christie did with Phasma or what Hugo Weaving did with V.

And before anyone cites Fett or even Vader in the OT, remember that there's a *world* of difference between playing a supporting role/glorified extra and the central charter in an action drama.
I have a feeling if they did a Boba Fett movie he'd probably spend the majority of his time with the helmet off. Getting a movie where the main character keeps his face covered the entire, or even most, of the time is pretty rare. Even in movies where the main character is known to wear a mask, the movies tend to take every possible chance to get the mask off.
Dredd is the only movie I can think of where the main character never uncovered his face.
 
I have a feeling if they did a Boba Fett movie he'd probably spend the majority of his time with the helmet off. Getting a movie where the main character keeps his face covered the entire, or even most, of the time is pretty rare. Even in movies where the main character is known to wear a mask, the movies tend to take every possible chance to get the mask off.
Dredd is the only movie I can think of where the main character never uncovered his face.

Though to be fair it would probably be weird for Boba Fett to be wearing the helmet 24/7 since Star Wars has already established that Bounty hunters, Mandalorians, and ect. usually take them off when their not on the clock.
 
Fair points I suppose.
Maybe I'm too much of an old school fan but the idea of Boba Fett with his helmet off just feels weird, in spite of how little practical sense it makes to have him in that thing all the time. And yes I know already we saw him in AoTC & TCW...but that's different.

Perhaps what would feel more natural is if they go the anti-hero origin story route, where he doesn't put on the supercommando armor until the third act or something. Like say instead of continuing the path he was on, he's tried to settle down and have a "normal life", until <insert inciting incident> happens and he get's pulled back into the life.
I would make a kind of sense for him to at least try to lay low after the Clone Wars. After all, Windu is dead, the Jedi are "gone" so revenge is no longer a motivating factor and one of the benefits of having his face is that he can easily blend in with the hundreds of thousands of clones being demobbed out of the military all over the galaxy.

Perhaps more will be done with Phasma in later installments, but I don't think what little we saw from Phasma in TFA really required significant talent or experience.

I thought she did a good job at emoting, despite the getup. There's a subtlety to it in that it's easy to take for granted and you only really notice the talent by it's absence. Not many people can noticeably convey a sneer though an implacable mask. It's purportedly very difficult to pull off for most actors, unless they have a particular background in mime or dance.
 
Last edited:
Fair points I suppose.
Maybe I'm too much of an old school fan but the idea of Boba Fett with his helmet off just feels weird, in spite of how little practical sense it makes to have him in that thing all the time. And yes I know already we saw him in AoTC & TCW...but that's different.
Meh, I can see the issue if Boba Fett had never been seen without his helmet, if his appearance is secret or something. But that's not the case, we know what Boba Fett looks like, there's no mystery to ruin. So there's no reason he can't take the helmet off.

And it's not like they can't keep the actor's face on screen in key scenes even if he's wearing the helmet, just do the interior helmet thing the Iron Man movies do.
 
^It's not so much about identity as it is about persona, if that makes any sense. Like with Dredd, there's no mystery as to what's under the helmet (Dredd looks like Fargo and Fargo's face is known), that's not the point. The point is that to all intents and purposes the helmet *is* his face.

Again, I know it's not 100% rational but before AotC Fett was a version of the mysterious gunslinger trope, like "The Man With No Name". In that case, it doesn't matter that he really does have a name, you don't want to know it. It's irrelevant and it would de mystify the character.

From an in-universe perspective there's good reason why Fett might never take the helmet off except in private: thanks to the Clone Wars the face of Jango Fett is very recognisable and he'd just as soon not be taken as some old clone trooper of deserter. Or maybe it's deeper and he'd rather not look at his reflection and see his dead father staring back at him.

Just to be clear, I'm not dead-set against him being seen without the helmet on, but I feel from a mythic storytelling perspective, once he starts wearing it, the audience should not see him take it off again.
 
Yeah, I always thought it interesting how Vader had to specifically address this towards Fett, almost unsaid are the extra words "...unlike that last time, you bloody minded clone!"
 
Vader acting like his comic self is going to be great

I forsee great things happening. Just like when he dueled with Ezra and Kanan in "Rebels"

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Vader wasn't even trying his hardest. He could have killed them but he was toying with them


Darth%20Vader%20007-013.jpg



surrounded.png

Dead-Men-Tell-No-Tales.jpg
 
TRAILER!!!!
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This looks AMAZING!
?Jynn? is a criminal. Whittaker is a Black Ops Stormtrooper! And I think I saw a BSG Cylon running around behind her! AT-ATs!!! A creepy Grand Admiral! Mon Mothma!!!

So, was she originally an Imperial who got arrested for those listed crimes? Is that final shot her as an Imperial at the start of the movie, or her undercover as an Imperial?
 
Last edited:
It looks EXTREMELY similar visually to TFA, very realistic and shaky-cam. This is a good thing to me. :beer:
 
TRAILER!!!!
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This looks AMAZING!
?Jynn? is a criminal. Whittaker is a Black Ops Stormtrooper! And I think I saw a BSG Cylon running around behind her! AT-ATs!!! A creepy Grand Admiral! Mon Mothma!!!
DAMN.

tumblr_liebpzbCOv1qdkf2k.gif
 
Great trailer. I posted specific thoughts over in the trailer thread.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top