Personally, I find it a bit odd that a Doctor Who episode was going to feature a beheading in the first place.
Personally, I find it a bit odd that a Doctor Who episode was going to feature a beheading in the first place.
Personally, I find it a bit odd that a Doctor Who episode was going to feature a beheading in the first place.
Personally, I find it a bit odd that a Doctor Who episode was going to feature a beheading in the first place.
I could be wrong about this, but I believe it was a robot's head, which makes the censorship doubly crazy.
It's self-censorship then, which is barely better.You know, it's not censorship. The Beeb owns DW. They have a right to put in or take out whatever they want.
I have of course not seen the episode, but it's usually not that hard to cut to a reaction shot, is it?Having seen the full episode to write the preview, I have to admit my reaction to seeing the scene at the time was "really?"
It is going to be very interesting to see how the edit is done and how much it affects how that third act is perceived.
Oh I'm hilarious.Self-censorship is also known as tact or class. Everybody getting upset about a shot is kind of funny.
I have of course not seen the episode, but it's usually not that hard to cut to a reaction shot, is it?Having seen the full episode to write the preview, I have to admit my reaction to seeing the scene at the time was "really?"
It is going to be very interesting to see how the edit is done and how much it affects how that third act is perceived.
Heh heh. "Cut around" Heh heh.it shoudn't be too hard to cut around.
Self-censorship is also known as tact or class. Everybody getting upset about a shot is kind of funny.
It probably is sensible of the BBC to do this; there is a horrible possibility that ISIS is planning to murder the British hostage during the British-hosted NATO summit that just began in Cardiff, so there's a nasty possibility that news of that will break just before or after this episode goes out. Usually I'm against kneejerk censorship, but in this case...
Yeah I would tend to agree. I've seen some bad knee jerk censorship though. I still remember after Hungerford ITV I think pulled a revenge western and then showed Firefox instead...Firefox which shows various scientists being gunned down by Kalashnikovs...
Even worse than that: I was working in TV listings at the time and ended up doing overtime to put through the schedule changes on the day of the Dunblane massacre, one of which was...
The BBC pulled a film because of its title (I always remember it as being the Bond film Licence to Kill, but it must have been something in the style as Bond would have been on ITV) and replaced it in part with an episode of the sitcom Waiting for God... in which Graham Crowden's character said to Stephanie Cole's "Haven't you got something better to do, Diana? What about machine-gunning children? You always enjoy that."
The perils of rushed schedule changes.
Maybe they´ll forget changing the file on itunes or it might be to late to do that now...there is a (slim) chance that the scene is in the itunes version. Since my only way of watching it before the DVD comes out is itunes anyway I´ll keep you updated.
Maybe they´ll forget changing the file on itunes or it might be to late to do that now...there is a (slim) chance that the scene is in the itunes version. Since my only way of watching it before the DVD comes out is itunes anyway I´ll keep you updated.
I was just on another forum, and someone there mentioned that DW has been self-censored before. In the pre-aired version of the "Everybody Lives" two-parter, there was audio of a neck being cracked. That sound was removed for the broadcast version, but restored for the DVD release.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.