The only thing I ever thought was out of place was the idea of people who are bred for luck. Although I think it's a brilliant (and hilarious) concept for fiction, it seemed too metaphysical for the hard science fictional Universe of the Ringworld.
The Ringworld is unstable.
Well, I read it when I was eleven or twelve years old, so it made a huge impression on me. I still think the Ringworld itself is an amazing creation. The square footage of that sucker is mind-boggling.And, of course, I loved the futuristic society that formed the background of the novel, because I was into that sort of thing pretty much since the moment I first drew breath.
The only thing I ever thought was out of place was the idea of people who are bred for luck. Although I think it's a brilliant (and hilarious) concept for fiction, it seemed too metaphysical for the hard science fictional Universe of the Ringworld.
Ringworld is fairly basic but still enjoyable. Ringworld Engineers, on the other hand, is awesome.
The only thing I ever thought was out of place was the idea of people who are bred for luck. Although I think it's a brilliant (and hilarious) concept for fiction, it seemed too metaphysical for the hard science fictional Universe of the Ringworld.
The only thing I ever thought was out of place was the idea of people who are bred for luck. Although I think it's a brilliant (and hilarious) concept for fiction, it seemed too metaphysical for the hard science fictional Universe of the Ringworld.
Maybe this is more a retcon from the later novels, but my impression was that the Puppeteers believed they were breeding for luck but Louis Wu remained skeptical. I don't think Niven ever definitively established Teela's "psychic luck" as a fact rather than just a belief.
The Ringworld is unstable.
I had that same reaction: how do you breed for "luck"?
It's not like a nose or something....
That never occurred to me, but, yeah, that's exactly right.The only thing I ever thought was out of place was the idea of people who are bred for luck. Although I think it's a brilliant (and hilarious) concept for fiction, it seemed too metaphysical for the hard science fictional Universe of the Ringworld.
Yeah, it sounds a bit more Hitchhiker's Guide, doesn't it?
Yeah. "Oh, and by the way, it has attitude jets."The Ringworld is unstable.
Hahaha! Oh man, that gave me a good laugh. I miss the 70's...
Yeah, but even then an impersonal Universe would somehow have to know what is best for someone-- sometimes over the very long run.If we live in a multiverse where everything that can possibly happen does happen, it's plausible that some people appear to be extraordinarily lucky. However, I doubt you can link this to a phenotype unless the brain really does use quantum effects in its operation (as suggested by Penrose) and certain configurations of microtubule organisation can skew the "throw of the dice".
Actually, he started out thinking it was just a statistical fluke, but came to be a believer because his kid with Teela inherited the "luck" gene.Maybe this is more a retcon from the later novels, but my impression was that the Puppeteers believed they were breeding for luck but Louis Wu remained skeptical. I don't think Niven ever definitively established Teela's "psychic luck" as a fact rather than just a belief.
The only thing I ever thought was out of place was the idea of people who are bred for luck. Although I think it's a brilliant (and hilarious) concept for fiction, it seemed too metaphysical for the hard science fictional Universe of the Ringworld.
Maybe this is more a retcon from the later novels, but my impression was that the Puppeteers believed they were breeding for luck but Louis Wu remained skeptical. I don't think Niven ever definitively established Teela's "psychic luck" as a fact rather than just a belief.
I had that same reaction: how do you breed for "luck"?
It's not like a nose or something....
Yeah, but even then an impersonal Universe would somehow have to know what is best for someone-- sometimes over the very long run.If we live in a multiverse where everything that can possibly happen does happen, it's plausible that some people appear to be extraordinarily lucky. However, I doubt you can link this to a phenotype unless the brain really does use quantum effects in its operation (as suggested by Penrose) and certain configurations of microtubule organisation can skew the "throw of the dice".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.