Aw, shucks. Can I at least borrow GodBen's equipment? Mine is small and weak.Gee, Kegg, I was all set to invite you to join my rape gang but if you're gonna be all snotty about it...
Getting to meet Harve Bennett at Farpoint a few years ago is a high point in my fandom.Oh wow, I never knew any of that. Glad to hear they buried the hatchet, though.
And yet, the TNG actors themselves actually got along that well, and loved working together, and didn't seem to have any major friction between them. Stranger than fiction?This was the real problem with Roddenberry's TNG: the character interactions rang false and hollow no matter how they related to each other and thus the show felt as if it was written by a moderately gifted 12-year-old.
I tried to reply to this, but everything I came up with was a warnable offence.Aw, shucks. Can I at least borrow GodBen's equipment? Mine is small and weak.Gee, Kegg, I was all set to invite you to join my rape gang but if you're gonna be all snotty about it...
^ Can you please provide sources to back up your claims that Berman "bashed the original Star Trek almost every chance he got"
During the The Next Generation episode "Sarek", the writers were not allowed to use the name "Spock" when talking about Sarek's son.
^ Can you please provide sources to back up your claims that Berman "bashed the original Star Trek almost every chance he got"
During the The Next Generation episode "Sarek", the writers were not allowed to use the name "Spock" when talking about Sarek's son.
...yeah, but wasn't The Naked Now about the third episode?^ Can you please provide sources to back up your claims that Berman "bashed the original Star Trek almost every chance he got"
During the The Next Generation episode "Sarek", the writers were not allowed to use the name "Spock" when talking about Sarek's son.
Wasn't that more of a Gene Roddenberry thing? He wanted to distinguish the new show from the old one as much as possible, and didn't want Picard and co. talking about Kirk if they could avoid it.
I think that was from one of the ideas that was kicked around for "Yesterday's Enterprise," which would have had Sarek going back in time to become Surak. (Which, now that I type that, reminds me of Michael Moorcock's Behold the Man.)I do recall that the original, very different idea for "Sarek" would have involved the Guardian of Forever, which Berman dismissed as a "gimmick" from TOS.
Yup. Ironically that's what I was thinking of - they made a point of not mentioning Kirk there even though the episode required them to bring up his starship....yeah, but wasn't The Naked Now about the third episode?
I do recall that the original, very different idea for "Sarek" would have involved the Guardian of Forever, which Berman dismissed as a "gimmick" from TOS.
I would have loved to have seen that come about.Dorothy is great, and Spock and the Guardian, a favorite ST concept..oh yes. As for Berman, I am not pleased with every decision he's made, or perhaps Braga, depending, but, to me they brought about several series I am very fond of, along with folks like Jeri Taylor and Michael Piller, so I am grateful for their overall work.I think that was from one of the ideas that was kicked around for "Yesterday's Enterprise," which would have had Sarek going back in time to become Surak. (Which, now that I type that, reminds me of Michael Moorcock's Behold the Man.)I do recall that the original, very different idea for "Sarek" would have involved the Guardian of Forever, which Berman dismissed as a "gimmick" from TOS.
D.C. Fontana's idea for the second season opener was a story called "Return to Forever," which would have involved the Guardian and a movie-era Spock. Obviously, Fontana didn't stay with the series that long, and the WGA strike would have made trying to line Nimoy up (i.e., a script he was happy with) problematical.
D.C. Fontana's idea for the second season opener was a story called "Return to Forever," which would have involved the Guardian and a movie-era Spock. Obviously, Fontana didn't stay with the series that long, and the WGA strike would have made trying to line Nimoy up (i.e., a script he was happy with) problematical.
Hmm. Possibly I'm conflating a different Fontana/Spock story with "Return to Forever"? Fontana was involved in a Spock story for NextGen; after "Unification" aired, she was quoted in an interview as saying that that proved that she did have the right take on the 24th-century after all, as Roddenberry had told her that she didn't understand it.Tracy Tormé was the writer of that story, not Fontana who had left the production a few episodes into the first season. Her last contribution to TNG was "Too Short a Season."D.C. Fontana's idea for the second season opener was a story called "Return to Forever," which would have involved the Guardian and a movie-era Spock. Obviously, Fontana didn't stay with the series that long, and the WGA strike would have made trying to line Nimoy up (i.e., a script he was happy with) problematical.
Hmm. Possibly I'm conflating a different Fontana/Spock story with "Return to Forever"? Fontana was involved in a Spock story for NextGen; after "Unification" aired, she was quoted in an interview as saying that that proved that she did have the right take on the 24th-century after all, as Roddenberry had told her that she didn't understand it.Tracy Tormé was the writer of that story, not Fontana who had left the production a few episodes into the first season. Her last contribution to TNG was "Too Short a Season."D.C. Fontana's idea for the second season opener was a story called "Return to Forever," which would have involved the Guardian and a movie-era Spock. Obviously, Fontana didn't stay with the series that long, and the WGA strike would have made trying to line Nimoy up (i.e., a script he was happy with) problematical.
And a lot like a tragic "Trials and Tribble-ations."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.