Berman is like Gene. Both held to their vision far too long, to the point where audiences abandoned them. In their respective days they were great, but neither of them could change with the times.
While Orci's writing left much to be desired, I think most of Into Darkness's faults are by Damon Lindelof.
I'm not sure I'd say "most" but yes, it was Lindelof who kept insisting on using Khan, even after an original villain was created.
Berman is like Gene. Both held to their vision far too long, to the point where audiences abandoned them. In their respective days they were great, but neither of them could change with the times.
Sorry, Rick, but these new movies are exactly what I want Star Trek to be.No one wants the next Star Trek movie to work more than I do. I just hope it's a little closer to the movie we all want it to be.
While Orci's writing left much to be desired, I think most of Into Darkness's faults are by Damon Lindelof.
I'm not sure I'd say "most" but yes, it was Lindelof who kept insisting on using Khan, even after an original villain was created.
Had they not used Khan for the 'new' Star Trek 2, folks would have wished they had. I don't think the worry is that Khan was in the movie but how he was written in.
I loved Amazing Spiderman 2 and thought it was a very gripping story.
I loved Amazing Spiderman 2 and thought it was a very gripping story.
You're being facetious right?
I loved Amazing Spiderman 2 and thought it was a very gripping story.
You're being facetious right?
I'm not a big Spiderman fan, but my wife loved the movie. I thought it was moderately entertaining but instantly forgettable. Much like the other Marvel (Avengers, Iron Man, etc.) movies.
I loved Amazing Spiderman 2 and thought it was a very gripping story.
You're being facetious right?
I'm not a big Spiderman fan, but my wife loved the movie. I thought it was moderately entertaining but instantly forgettable. Much like the other Marvel (Avengers, Iron Man, etc.) movies.
While Orci's writing left much to be desired, I think most of Into Darkness's faults are by Damon Lindelof.
I'm not sure I'd say "most" but yes, it was Lindelof who kept insisting on using Khan, even after an original villain was created.
A different guy with 70 people in those torpedoes.While Orci's writing left much to be desired, I think most of Into Darkness's faults are by Damon Lindelof.
I'm not sure I'd say "most" but yes, it was Lindelof who kept insisting on using Khan, even after an original villain was created.
Huh? If John Harrison wouldn't have been Khan, then what would have been his motivation? Harrison's every action was motivated by those 70 people in those torpedoes.
Um, no. My facetious face looks like thisI loved Amazing Spiderman 2 and thought it was a very gripping story.
You're being facetious right?
Cause what he says matters right?
And:Is it sacrilegious that I'm more excited about Larry Kasdan's upcoming Star Wars film than the next Star Trek movie?
No one wants the next Star Trek movie to work more than I do. I just hope it's a little closer to the movie we all want it to be.
While Orci's writing left much to be desired, I think most of Into Darkness's faults are by Damon Lindelof.
I'm not sure I'd say "most" but yes, it was Lindelof who kept insisting on using Khan, even after an original villain was created.
Huh? If John Harrison wouldn't have been Khan, then what would have been his motivation? Harrison's every action was motivated by those 70 people in those torpedoes.
Cause what he says matters right?
And:Is it sacrilegious that I'm more excited about Larry Kasdan's upcoming Star Wars film than the next Star Trek movie?
No one wants the next Star Trek movie to work more than I do. I just hope it's a little closer to the movie we all want it to be.
I don't see how he's wrong in either of those statements. I happen to totally agree with him, there.
Not everyone here hates the Berman era. I happen to love most of it. Also, STID was an utter disappointment for me. I am not the biggest fan of NuTrek, but I am not rooting for it to fail, either.
So yeah, I want to see Trek do better with Star Trek 13, than it did with STID. Trek 2009 was a far superior film to me, in every meaningful way, than STID. I would like to see 13 make me feel the same way about Trek as 2009 did, than just be more of the same as STID.
Also, I was initially skeptical of Star Wars VII, AKA The Search for More Money, but I've been reading some pretty positive things, so I AM more stoked about the next Star Wars movie than I am about the next NuTrek movie, right now.
I don't understand the attitude that some have that if you like Trek, you must automatically hate Star Wars, and vice versa. I've always loved both.
I'm not sure I'd say "most" but yes, it was Lindelof who kept insisting on using Khan, even after an original villain was created.
Huh? If John Harrison wouldn't have been Khan, then what would have been his motivation? Harrison's every action was motivated by those 70 people in those torpedoes.
I'd assume the decision to use Khan came fairly early, I don't think they changed Harrison to Khan at the last second.
TASM2 actually took the time to show the effects of grief on Peter, unlike most other outings where the hero would get his sh*t together inbetween sequels. I appreciated the effort at being different.You were impressed with the Rhino ending?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.