I'm rewatching season one of 24. I remember being very into it back in the day, and I watched it all over the years through ups and downs.
It's amazing to think how revolutionary it was at the time. It is however showing its age quite a bit. I think their heavy use of technology probably helps the aging process compared to some shows that can be more timeless. It also looks surprisingly low budget for what feels like a big concept show. (I imagine it gets more money in later seasons.)
But something surprised me rewatching season one and I'm a third of the way through the season: I thought "This feels really post 9/11" and looked up the date and sure enough season one ran from July 2001 into 2002.
It became a favourite cliché of news organisations to describe everything as post 9/11, much like their current fixation is Gen Z. GEN Z WEAR HATS! GEN Z REFUSE TO EAT TURNIPS. GEN Z HATE BOATS. GEN Z HAVE SAVED CRUISE LINES. et al. Everything had to be tied back to 9/11 for a long time and it still crops up in articles.
It may be just coincidence, particularly as it started two months before the event.
But it just has that paranoid vibe. Danger. The enemy within. Anyone could be dangerous. Outside forces are working against US democracy. The cameraman looked a certain way, he must be up to trouble. Oh there's a mysterious bag someone has, what's in it and what danger is there? No actually it's someone in a position of power as part of a big conspiracy who's the danger.
I could just be conflating drama with real events and am no better than the editorials. But I do wonder how much the events of 9/11 fed into that 24 narrative as they were writing it.
It's amazing to think how revolutionary it was at the time. It is however showing its age quite a bit. I think their heavy use of technology probably helps the aging process compared to some shows that can be more timeless. It also looks surprisingly low budget for what feels like a big concept show. (I imagine it gets more money in later seasons.)
But something surprised me rewatching season one and I'm a third of the way through the season: I thought "This feels really post 9/11" and looked up the date and sure enough season one ran from July 2001 into 2002.
It became a favourite cliché of news organisations to describe everything as post 9/11, much like their current fixation is Gen Z. GEN Z WEAR HATS! GEN Z REFUSE TO EAT TURNIPS. GEN Z HATE BOATS. GEN Z HAVE SAVED CRUISE LINES. et al. Everything had to be tied back to 9/11 for a long time and it still crops up in articles.
It may be just coincidence, particularly as it started two months before the event.
But it just has that paranoid vibe. Danger. The enemy within. Anyone could be dangerous. Outside forces are working against US democracy. The cameraman looked a certain way, he must be up to trouble. Oh there's a mysterious bag someone has, what's in it and what danger is there? No actually it's someone in a position of power as part of a big conspiracy who's the danger.
I could just be conflating drama with real events and am no better than the editorials. But I do wonder how much the events of 9/11 fed into that 24 narrative as they were writing it.