With Mad Men nearing its end in a couple of weeks (two episodes left) I began thinking about doing a revisit from the beginning. But I find myself unable to wait until the series finale.
I started watching Mad Men from the very beginning. Back before the series premiered I caught early promotional spots for the then upcoming show and there was something about them that intrigued me. Thinking back I’m a bit hardpressed to recall what it was exactly that caught my interest. I’m pretty sure there was something about the period setting that intrigued me. And there also seemed to be a hint of mystery to it as well. Somehow it just seemed somewhat more substantial than most everything else that was being aired at the time. There is also the fact that the 1960s were my formative yeasr (I was born in 1959) so much of what I saw had a measure of resonance and memory for me albeit from a child's perspective.
So I made a point of tuning in for the very first episode…and I have been a regular viewer since.
On the face of it this is basically a soap opera. But somewhat similar to the primetime soap operas (like Dallas) that began in the late ‘70s and unlike the daily daytime soaps Mad Men went somewhere. The stories and characters evolved and moved forward. And from the very first each episode seemed to say something—sometimes small and sometimes large. There seemed to be meaning in what we saw unfolding onscreen. And that’s something I do like seeing film and television I find genuinely interesting, be it science fiction or contemporary or period drama.
Season 1
Episode 1: “Smoke Gets In Your Eyes”
The premiere episode nicely sets up the period setting. And what we see strips it bare of any real nostalgia. On the face of it we see the world as it was presented in television of the era such as Leave It To Beaver, Daddy Knows Best, My Three Sons and Bewitched. Here we see it’s all a façade and behind it we see a world that in many ways doesn’t seem that removed from our familiar contemporary world despite the outward appearances. Look past the dated fashions and music and social mannerisms and the people are just as complicated as today. They have different sides to them. They’re not wholly bad or wholly good, but the mixture varies in degree.
Don Draper is the central figure and when we first meet him he is the apparently ideal executive: youngish, Hollywood handsome, impeccably groomed, talented and accomplished. But bit-by-bit we start to see that facade peeled away. First we see him having an afternoon tryst with a woman named Midge. We don’t really think anything of it because we don’t know yet that Don Draper is married with children living in a picturesque house in the suburbs—the picture of the American dream. So the young Playboy style executive that looks to be the envy of any aspiring young male turns out to be a husband and father cheating on his wife. Up to now we could kind of like Don Draper, but a bit of doubt begins to raise its head.
And that isn’t the only thing. We next see Draper act completely unprofessional and even outright rude to a potential client. And it all (well mostly) stems from the client being a woman who is educated, intelligent and has the temerity to actually speak her mind. And unlike many other women of the period she doesn’t cower at the sound of a stern male voice. She is also rather different from the other women we have met so far, represented by Office Manager Joan Holloway and Draper’s new secretary Peggy Olsen. Those women speak constantly of navigating the male dominated world by forseeeing mens’ needs and enticing them with tantalizing glipses of sexual possibility. In contrast the potential female client, Rachel Mencken, navigates the same world using her intellect and business acumen. Rachel is the woman that many other women of the period might aspire to be if they believed they actually had a chance. But Rachel seems to have made her own way despite the obstacles. Joan, Peggy and the others represent a past era that was already beginning to change while Rachel represents the future somwhere over the horizon.
Beyond Don Draper the rest of male characters introduced are definitely not impressive. They are a clutch of little dickheads with overinflated egos and hormones to spare. They are best represented by young exec Peter Campbell who is ambitious and gunning for Don Draper’s job even as we see he hasn’t anywhere near the talent and ability. He is a plain little shit right off.
If we saw these characters, particularly the men, behave as they do in a contemporary set drama we would shake our head in disbelief. But what allows them to get away with their attrocious behaviour is the very fact that Mad Men in set in the world of 1960 where their misogynist behaviour was familiar, expected and openly tolerated. We can find their behaviour appaling even as we can find it fascinating.
There is a powerful sense of nostalgia to Mad Men, but the show honestly reveals that that it is only a foggy and wistful sentiment because the reality of that time had little to do with the nostalgic image.
I started watching Mad Men from the very beginning. Back before the series premiered I caught early promotional spots for the then upcoming show and there was something about them that intrigued me. Thinking back I’m a bit hardpressed to recall what it was exactly that caught my interest. I’m pretty sure there was something about the period setting that intrigued me. And there also seemed to be a hint of mystery to it as well. Somehow it just seemed somewhat more substantial than most everything else that was being aired at the time. There is also the fact that the 1960s were my formative yeasr (I was born in 1959) so much of what I saw had a measure of resonance and memory for me albeit from a child's perspective.
So I made a point of tuning in for the very first episode…and I have been a regular viewer since.
On the face of it this is basically a soap opera. But somewhat similar to the primetime soap operas (like Dallas) that began in the late ‘70s and unlike the daily daytime soaps Mad Men went somewhere. The stories and characters evolved and moved forward. And from the very first each episode seemed to say something—sometimes small and sometimes large. There seemed to be meaning in what we saw unfolding onscreen. And that’s something I do like seeing film and television I find genuinely interesting, be it science fiction or contemporary or period drama.
Season 1
Episode 1: “Smoke Gets In Your Eyes”
The premiere episode nicely sets up the period setting. And what we see strips it bare of any real nostalgia. On the face of it we see the world as it was presented in television of the era such as Leave It To Beaver, Daddy Knows Best, My Three Sons and Bewitched. Here we see it’s all a façade and behind it we see a world that in many ways doesn’t seem that removed from our familiar contemporary world despite the outward appearances. Look past the dated fashions and music and social mannerisms and the people are just as complicated as today. They have different sides to them. They’re not wholly bad or wholly good, but the mixture varies in degree.
Don Draper is the central figure and when we first meet him he is the apparently ideal executive: youngish, Hollywood handsome, impeccably groomed, talented and accomplished. But bit-by-bit we start to see that facade peeled away. First we see him having an afternoon tryst with a woman named Midge. We don’t really think anything of it because we don’t know yet that Don Draper is married with children living in a picturesque house in the suburbs—the picture of the American dream. So the young Playboy style executive that looks to be the envy of any aspiring young male turns out to be a husband and father cheating on his wife. Up to now we could kind of like Don Draper, but a bit of doubt begins to raise its head.
And that isn’t the only thing. We next see Draper act completely unprofessional and even outright rude to a potential client. And it all (well mostly) stems from the client being a woman who is educated, intelligent and has the temerity to actually speak her mind. And unlike many other women of the period she doesn’t cower at the sound of a stern male voice. She is also rather different from the other women we have met so far, represented by Office Manager Joan Holloway and Draper’s new secretary Peggy Olsen. Those women speak constantly of navigating the male dominated world by forseeeing mens’ needs and enticing them with tantalizing glipses of sexual possibility. In contrast the potential female client, Rachel Mencken, navigates the same world using her intellect and business acumen. Rachel is the woman that many other women of the period might aspire to be if they believed they actually had a chance. But Rachel seems to have made her own way despite the obstacles. Joan, Peggy and the others represent a past era that was already beginning to change while Rachel represents the future somwhere over the horizon.
Beyond Don Draper the rest of male characters introduced are definitely not impressive. They are a clutch of little dickheads with overinflated egos and hormones to spare. They are best represented by young exec Peter Campbell who is ambitious and gunning for Don Draper’s job even as we see he hasn’t anywhere near the talent and ability. He is a plain little shit right off.
If we saw these characters, particularly the men, behave as they do in a contemporary set drama we would shake our head in disbelief. But what allows them to get away with their attrocious behaviour is the very fact that Mad Men in set in the world of 1960 where their misogynist behaviour was familiar, expected and openly tolerated. We can find their behaviour appaling even as we can find it fascinating.
There is a powerful sense of nostalgia to Mad Men, but the show honestly reveals that that it is only a foggy and wistful sentiment because the reality of that time had little to do with the nostalgic image.
Last edited: