My first thought is not speakers, but rather George Pal's The Time Machine. Different!![]()
I like it! Weird and thus awesome.
Plus - body armour!
My first thought is not speakers, but rather George Pal's The Time Machine. Different!![]()
I like it! Weird and thus awesome.
Plus - body armour!
My first thought is not speakers, but rather George Pal's The Time Machine. Different!
I think they'll use the term Phaser only. I forget which of the early Trek books I read, but in the development stages of TOS, they thought of what to settle on for the weapons, and Phaser was always preferred.
Agreed. Lasers was not used as it would not function the way GR wanted in the story, and those pistols were never seen again. The idea of a phaser was one that allowed more flexibility in writing, much in the way "plasma weapons" have become in contemporary science fiction.The first is an audio effect applied to a wave form, not a weapon;
The second is the closest you get, but it's just a dazzler device and not even spelled the same;
And the last is not only spelled differently, but it has no use as a weapon, either.
My point stands: phasers don't exist. Thus it's easy to say a phaser weapon can do certain things that a laser weapon cannot. The term LASER was originally used by the Star Trek production team because it was brand new and cool. After a couple years of reflection, and at the recommendation of scientific advisers from, I believe, General Atomics, they changed the name. Nothing could be done about the footage already 'in the can' from the first two pilots. A similar mentality surfaced from Roddenberry about the changed Klingons in The Motion Picture. He suggested we pretend that's how they looked all along.
Unfortunate that the game didn't fair better. I liked see the variety of uniforms.Also, does that armour remind anyone else of the ill-fated 2013 Star Trek videogame?
![]()
My first thought is not speakers, but rather George Pal's The Time Machine. Different!
My first thought is not speakers, but rather George Pal's The Time Machine. Different!
Everyone says that, but it isn't so.
If the show looks like crap it will die a quick death.
I agree and can see why they changed it. But those changes were for the series proper and came along with a design change too. So It never negated the original use of Lasers.
Real world phasers can't either, so I don't think using the word needs to be limited on what real world objects with similar names can do. Star Wars uses the name "lasers" and they could care less about what real world lasers can actually do.
I wonder who thought the "Giant LPs of DOOM" were a good design choice.
Also just noticed: Phaser holster on the leg rather than the hip.
Minor detail but WHAT ELSE DO WE HAVE? lol
Fortunately it doesn't look like crap then!Everyone says that, but it isn't so.
If the show looks like crap it will die a quick death.
My thoughts exactly! It's actually quite retro, but not in the way anyone would expect for Trek. Although I agree that the close-up of the crooked black squares really makes the set design look cheap and unfinished. I personally like straight lines and don't understand the aversion to them.My first thought is not speakers, but rather George Pal's The Time Machine. Different!
I would watch that over and over again. Or, could be a video game. Either way, I'm sold.It's time for Left-Tenant Lara Croft to go phaser down some Klingons in the Tomb of Kahless I say. Then back home for tea with Holo-Winston....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.