Is the site available through the Wayback Machine at archive.org?Here's another fairly high resolution photo that most of us have probably seen before (but does not seem to show up that much in image searches); it was sourced from William McCullars' old site. Kinda puts to rest the "blue dorsal" debate, by the way. I think there was quite a lot of stuff on that site that has now become somewhat "super secret" since its disappearance.
![]()
Since it never happened, it's obviously not an issue. The ship was more vulnerable to internal "sabataaage."It's even more apparent that the bulbous bridge on top of the saucer and forward section is just asking for a phaser or torpedo blast to wipe out the bridge and its crew. Mission over, man. Mission over.
Is the site available through the Wayback Machine at archive.org?
SWEET!!! I have never seen this one before.Here's another fairly high resolution photo that most of us have probably seen before (but does not seem to show up that much in image searches); it was sourced from William McCullars' old site. Kinda puts to rest the "blue dorsal" debate, by the way. I think there was quite a lot of stuff on that site that has now become somewhat "super secret" since its disappearance.
![]()
Re: Enterprise Restoration Blog Update 9/2015 - With New Photo from 19
That was my first thought too. I suppose the model was insured, but I wonder if anyone thought to add auto collision to the policy. The shadows in the road are probably the guys in the photo, standing guard.
How about the foretelling license plate on the Ford sedan - PAU 030. Was this another Vulcan visitation on Earth after Carbon Creek? A relative of T'PAU?
Considering the era, the aforementioned rocket and saucer ideas could have pointed a few onlookers in the right direction, but we also have to remember that people tend to collect a wealth of information--visual ideas and file them in their mind as hard facts, so for the average Californian, "spaceship" would not be the first thought, since in their minds--particularly in that early Space Race period--only thinks of then-traditional rockets. Modification or influence does not enter the consideration.
Here's another fairly high resolution photo that most of us have probably seen before (but does not seem to show up that much in image searches); it was sourced from William McCullars' old site. Kinda puts to rest the "blue dorsal" debate, by the way. I think there was quite a lot of stuff on that site that has now become somewhat "super secret" since its disappearance.
![]()
Tuesday.
Ah, but based on the sources I have seen, the date those street photos were taken (December 29th, 1964) WAS in fact a Tuesday.![]()
Here's another fairly high resolution photo that most of us have probably seen before (but does not seem to show up that much in image searches); it was sourced from William McCullars' old site. Kinda puts to rest the "blue dorsal" debate, by the way. I think there was quite a lot of stuff on that site that has now become somewhat "super secret" since its disappearance.
![]()
This was very forward thinking design given the era.Actually when you zoom in, this picture and the others are pretty low rez but I took a shot at it anyway.
I think I'm done now other than getting some full rez copies from the Smithsonian
![]()
Spockboy
Not necessarily.
![]()
Spockboy
Thank you for posting the Science Fiction Plus cover, Spockboy! A small, LQ b&w version of it appears on p.28 of Inside Star Trek, but they cut the date off along the top. This new image makes a gorgeous supplement to the favorite pages I'd scanned from a borrowed copy of the book.
That 1953 artwork is basically the Enterprise without a saucer section.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.