Not necessarily.
![]()
Spockboy
Well, I said "average Californian," and I can imagine they were not familiar with magazines like Science Fiction Plus.

Not necessarily.
![]()
Spockboy

Well, I said "average Californian," and I can imagine they were not familiar with magazines like Science Fiction Plus.![]()
Spockboy
), but I did find the following that perhaps some of you have also never seen. These pics are not exactly what I'd call "high-res", but they do offer some nice detail. Some of the shots showing the underside of the saucer clearly show some very subtle gridlines that I can't say I'd ever seen such clear evidence of. The lower sensor dome "tallywhacker" is also fairly clearly shown in couple shots. They also clearly show weathering / streaking, for example on the backs nacelles. And they clearly show the shape of the deflector dish "spire".







Nice!Well, now we all have...
Here's some more "roll-out" photos, courtesy of the Google machine; some of these B&Ws are taken from similar angles to color versions posted already, but they are all distinct from any posted so far in this thread.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thanks for the feedback Zap.
I appreciate it
I had some free time this afternoon so I restored the cover for you.
![]()
Take care,
Spockboy

From the shadow in the last photo, it looks like the photographer is looking down into the viewfinder, meaning an older, possibly large format camera. The negative detail should be excellent if it has survived well.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.