BOBW Part 2
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
RASCALS
Amen! Horrible! The kid Picard sounds like freakin' Tiny Tim in a community theatre production of "A Christmas Carol." Barf-inducing! -- RR
Which episode would you choose? The obvious choice is whichever one you think is the worst
The winner here is either The Game, in which the character of every member of the Enterprise crew (except Data) is brutally assassinated. So, Picard is actually a flunky who puts on a mental device without question and gets hooked on the high, needing Wesley Crusher to come to his rescue. Infuriating episode. Or, In the Pale Moonlight where Sisko is at the receiving end of horrific character assassination. So when it comes down to it, he sacrifices his humanity and becomes a condoner of the murder of innocents. Great. And this is the Bajoran spiritual leader?might a simply bad episode is less of a target than, say, an episode with terrible character assassination
I got nothing here.or something that violates your sense of Trek's continuity
Too many of these, too.or maybe one that is simply utterly forgettable and contributes nothing to Trek, though not necessarily 'terrible'?
Same here. The dark spots make the bright ones shine even brighter. Maybe...Personally I'd hate to get rid of ANY Trek - even the bad stuff - because it's all part of its history and the bad doesn't so much take away from Trek as highlight the good, in my opinion.
People, you're forgetting Threshold!
A guy points a gun to your head and says, "I have the power to alter reality so that one episode of Star Trek - and I mean TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, or ENT - will never have been made. It will puff out of existence, but all other episodes will remain intact. You must choose a single episode to disappear from history." Somehow, you sense the guy isn't completely insane and can indeed do what he threatens.
Which episode would you choose? The obvious choice is whichever one you think is the worst, but maybe that wouldn't be your choice; might a simply bad episode is less of a target than, say, an episode with terrible character assassination, or something that violates your sense of Trek's continuity, or maybe one that is simply utterly forgettable and contributes nothing to Trek, though not necessarily 'terrible'?
Personally I'd hate to get rid of ANY Trek - even the bad stuff - because it's all part of its history and the bad doesn't so much take away from Trek as highlight the good, in my opinion. What would you choose? I have to think about my answer.
Too bad Generations commited an even worse offense with only a single Bird of Prey.- The Federation Flag Ship was defeated by a couple of old Birds of Prey;
- Riker is a lousy tactician who does not utilise the full weapons arsenal of a Galaxy Class starship to prevent the ship from falling into enemy hands;
This topic is pretty appalling to me. I would no more authorize the de-canonization of a TOS episode than I would choose one of my own children to be killed. Of course the easy answer of worst TOS episode would be 'Spock's Brain", but I would no more have it taken out of canon than I would choose the child who has downs syndrome to die. I am extremely grateful that no of those who participated in the thread have the power to act upon their wishes.
And I'm appaled by the fact that for you a dead thing obviously is as important as a living being. Sure, we all like Star Trek but comparing your feelings toward the episodes to feelings about your own children is kind of creepy IMHO.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.