Red Angel Theories- Post Here

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by Vger23, Jan 19, 2019.

  1. NewHeavensNewEarth

    NewHeavensNewEarth Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2019
    It definitely looks like a 1-way trip. Shoutout again to the minority who predicted Discovery’s removal from the current timeline. :techman:
     
  2. Pauln6

    Pauln6 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Location:
    Bristol, United Kingdom
    I find it odd that the crew are so linear in their understanding of time travel. There is no reason why the Red Angel visitations or any other time travel has to take place in the same order they occur in our time stream.
     
    Alan Roi, Jaster and Ovation like this.
  3. Jaster

    Jaster Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2002
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Their pattern indicates...two-dimensional thinking.
     
    Ar-Pharazon and Pauln6 like this.
  4. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    Wouldn't sending the ship into the past be more effective against Control getting hold of it? Control could just go hide somewhere (other than the Delta quadrant ;)) and wait around for 500 or 1000 years. It's a lot less likely Control ever gets time travel tech to go back in time without the Sphere Data™.
     
  5. NewHeavensNewEarth

    NewHeavensNewEarth Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2019
    They talk of an "anchor point" in the future that neither suit seems able to avoid. I don't claim to fully understand temporal mechanics, though, particularly Trek temporal mechanics. And in the past, they would face the awkward possibility of a run-in with the Sphere itself. But if there's a return policy like Costco's, maybe the Sphere would take it off Discovery's hands. In any case, the anchor point seems to be at the root of it.
     
    Ar-Pharazon likes this.
  6. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    Ash brought up the possibility of Michael missing that anchor point and ending up anywhere/anytime. Obviously the plan is to go where Mama went.
     
    NewHeavensNewEarth likes this.
  7. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    She did say she hoped that she'd end up on Terralysia with her mother.
     
  8. NewHeavensNewEarth

    NewHeavensNewEarth Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2019
    And if Control tracked Discovery's whereabouts back to Boreth, I wouldn't be so sure about that. Makes me think of this:
    [​IMG]
     
  9. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    Lean into bad puns. :p
     
  10. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Annoyed by inappropriate use of the word "Need"
  11. Succubint

    Succubint Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2017
    What do you mean removal from the current timeline? Because I was against a complete reset or erasure of events we've already experienced over the past two seasons. I was against any kind of removal of Burnham from the prime universe because that would be, in my opinion, hugely disrespectful to the character and her journey.

    But this looks like a fairly straightforward jump to the distant future. In other words Discovery will be removed from the present, so that it and the sphere data merged with it can no longer be around for CONTROL to acquire. That does not equal a removal from the timeline. Everything Discovery did in the past still will exist as having happened.

    So, your wordage is confusing to me.
     
    Ovation and PiotrB like this.