Alliance Interceptor Vessel (AIV)
Galactic Alliance Patrol (GAP)
Alliance Cruiser Fusion Core (ACFC)
Galactic Alliance-Mars Division (GA-MD)
Yep, suffixes and acronyms, ya gotta be careful ( Star Trek: Discovery, I'm looking at you!)Yeah, saw that coming.
Well, if I'm writing I will usually call them (blank) Naval Force, or (blank) ground force, with Army and Navy being quick terms for it.Well, "need" was a bit of hyperbole. It would be more accurate to say that knowing the name of your military gives you more options when creating a ship prefix.
I've already evaluated the all of the non-"of" versions of those names ("Planetary Alliance", "Planetary League"). I came to the conclusion that they break Rule #2 (Name should not be "similar or identical to a non-generic name already in use"). Not sure the "of" should make a difference.Galactic Federation?
Galactic League?
League of Planets?
Galactic Alliance?
Alliance of Planets?
Republic is actually a rather flexible term, but that may be it's biggest problem. It can mean things that are not technically republics at all. The USSR was a "republic". Therefore, for humans at least, there is some connotation of authoritarianism, even if the dictionary definition of the term doesn't reflect that. So, yeah, even though a "republic" would describe something like the Federation, or even something less centralized, it's probably not the best term.I thought of "republic", but it seems too unified.
That's just a bizarre leap of logic to me. Republic pops up all over the place. Might as well dismiss the term "Democratic" because of the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" aka North Korea.Therefore, for humans at least, there is some connotation of authoritarianism, even if the dictionary definition of the term doesn't reflect that
I don't want to scare people off from using the term "Republic", per se. I just think it's slightly weighted towards a centralized government because it's been used by VERY centralized governments in the past. My personal view is that putting such terms in the name of your country tends to indicate insecurities regarding those terms (though it doesn't necessarily mean they're untrue).That's just a bizarre leap of logic to me. Republic pops up all over the place. Might as well dismiss the term "Democratic" because of the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" aka North Korea.
I think very few people would be scared off by the term. Hell, in America we celebrate the term in song and prose.I don't want to scare people off from using the term "Republic", per se. I just think it's slightly weighted towards a centralized government because it's been used by VERY centralized governments in the past. My personal view is that putting such terms in the name of your country tends to indicate insecurities regarding those terms (though it doesn't necessarily mean they're untrue).
About incorrect and misleading names, a long-time example would be the Holy Roman Empire. As Voltaire noted, it was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire. It was a loose confederation of semi-independent states, something like the European Union. Its name came from trying to associate itself with the Roman Empire. So one might want to think of self-congratulatory names like that.That's just a bizarre leap of logic to me. Republic pops up all over the place. Might as well dismiss the term "Democratic" because of the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" aka North Korea.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.