And sometimes squeezing a character in for the sake it can detract from the story, add clutter whatever.
After last Saturday I doubt it.^ Not if it's done well. Nope.
Why do so many people take the throw away line about Ian and Barbara literally?
Saying someone hasn't "aged" means they still are young at heart.
And this couple in Cambridge, both professors. Ian and Barbara Chesterton. Rumour has it, they've never aged. Not since the sixties. I wonder.
Maybe we'll get Ian in the Christmas special. Its just the sort of sentimental thing that would go down well for the holiday.
How could the Doctor travel back to the original co-ordinates of Gallifrey? Isn't the entire constellation of Kasterborus time locked?
One problem with bringing back Ian would be the last reference to him directly by a character in the Doctor Who universe. That character being Sarah Jane Smith. She mentions a pair of teacher (who are certainly Ian and Barbara) that haven't aged since the 60s. They can do a lot of things, but it would be tricky to get William Russell to look like he did in 1965. If Moffat sticks with RTD's canon from SJA, than he is sort of stuck when it comes to Ian. (also were they not suppose to be college professors, rather than head master of Coal Hill?)
Interestingly the series has not acknowledged Elisabeth Sladen's (Sarah Jane Smith) passing at all, apart from the cancellation of SJA.
("The Day of the Doctor")be lost in another universe, frozen in a single moment.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.