............... even so, do you think you could still write a better love story than George Lucas?
[Question directed at Bill]
[Question directed at Bill]
teacake said:Why isn't it a big part of the story?
............... even so, do you think you could still write a better love story than George Lucas?
[Question directed at Bill]
A couple of the original Apes sequels were amazing.
2takesfrakes said:There was a nicely handled romance in that one, as I recall ... between Val Kilmer and some chick who looked like a female Michael Jackson.
A lot? No, a little.Maybe so, but there's a lot of DUNE in A NEW HOPE ... "spice," in fact is actually mentioned, by name.
One could do worse than being compared to 70s SF.
I lament that the era of 70s filmmaking in general is no longer with us.
For example, there was this guy named George Lucas who put out some pretty good SF in the 70s.
teacake said:Why isn't it a big part of the story?
It isn't?
Wasn't George Lucas involved in Willow? There was a nicely handled romance in that one, as I recall ... between Val Kilmer and some chick who looked like a female Michael Jackson.
You do realize there are plenty of legitimate reasons to criticize Star Wars, and not just the prequels, without having to invent any, right?Maybe so, but there's a lot of DUNE in A NEW HOPE ... "spice," in fact is actually mentioned, by name.
For the most part I agree. And I know a great deal of the dialogue between Anakin and Padme can be easily dismissed as poorly or clumsily written. However, there are a couple of moments where I think Lucas gets it right. Anakin's reaction to being a father is one of them. The other is a scene that is oft-maligned, but I think really "gets" the whole madly, crazily, stupidly in love banter that a couple can have: The balcony "You are so beautiful" scene in RotS. It's cheesy, corny and absolutely the kind of conversation that can happen when two people are in an all-consuming love. That moment works - but people react poorly to it because it's the kind of sickeningly sweet nonsense people in love can say to one another that makes the rest of us (or at least some of us) simultaneously say, "yuck" and "I wish I was that in love".I think if Anakin had been a sympathetic and charismatic bad boy we wouldn't be struggling to see what was (presumably) intended to be evident, it would come naturally as part of the undercurrent of a great romance.
That's the bit that is missing. A great romance![]()
Or a Krayt Dragon.Supposedly, that big skeleton 3PO passes in the desert was supposed to be a nod to the sandworms, like it was supposed to be a sandworm skeleton.
Why can't Disney just reboot the prequels? I would be all for that and I'm certain others would be, as well. Just ... do 'em over! I'll go see it .................. even so, do you think you could still write a better love story than George Lucas?
[Question directed at Bill]
Honestly? I don't know. I do know that no one is breaking down my door to pay me to find out though.
But is it really the writing, or the directing, or the acting, or a combination of all three that make the Anakin/Padme romance so poor?
I still don't know where all this DUNE stuff is going. Spice? Okay. Maybe. But the word spice and spices' collective value as a traded commodity goes back many centuries here on Earth, so it may have had nothing to do with Frank Herbert. At all.
Remember, Lucas immersed himself in history and mythology and I don't think we can just say that Han dumping a spice shipment meant for Jabba is any proof that DUNE is directly referenced. If it was, fine. Cool. But....where's the evidence, though? And does it matter?
No.The original DUNE movie had alot of trouble bringing the book to the screen, because STAR WARS took so many ideas from it ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.