It's estimated that a side effect of ObamaCare will be the loss of anywhere from 30% to 60% of private pratice GP offices. While most political types in favor of it either dismiss/ignore the forcast, and those opposed to it use it as fuel to attack the new law saying it will not only cause many pratices to close, doctors to retire, and overload the hospital networks.
Please provide your source(s) from now on so people can verify or rebut that information.
Outside of personal sources, which I will admit is NJ/NYC area focused (my mother works in both a private pratice that is being forced to merge with several other pratices, cut staff, and has informed the staff staying that there will be no raises or bonuses for the foreseeable future in order to survive, as well as at a hospital which has not only merged into a local hospital group, but is also now a part of the Allspire Health Partners monster... Several family friends are also in the medical field in the area) it has been showing in many doctor surveys over several years now.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/11/17/primary.care.doctors.study/index.html
http://www.nejmcareercenter.org/minisites/rpt/1-in-3-physicians-plans-to-quit-within-10-years/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/marcsie...care-foretells-mass-exodus-from-patient-care/
http://www.californiahealthline.org...uitting-medicare-is-obamacare-really-to-blame
http://www.californiahealthline.org...uitting-medicare-is-obamacare-really-to-blame
Let's consider your sources in respective order, and what bearing they have on your claim:
Claim of Data Holmes said:It's estimated that a side effect of ObamaCare [PPACA] will be the loss of anywhere from 30% to 60% of private pratice [sic] GP offices.
Source #1: This article is dated November 18, 2008, which was about two months before President Obama was sworn in and well over a year before the PPACA was signed into law. Since it therefore has no bearing on your claim that the PPACA will cause a loss of private practice GP offices, further examination of it is unnecessary.
Source #2: What's interesting about this article is that they don't actually cite a particular survey. All they do is tell us that the survey was performed by "healthcare staffing recruiters Jackson Healthcare" and that it was new when the article was written (July 2012). But we can phone or email HealthLeaders Media for more information, should we so desire it. So, instead of concrete data, we're already getting a run around. Nice.
In any case, moving on to their actual claims, it says, "16% of the respondents said they will, or are strongly considering retiring, leaving medicine, or going part-time in 2012." So, what can we conclude about how many private practice GP offices will be reduced in 2012? Why, absolutely nothing!
What about the whole decade? The article says, "Blaming low compensation and the hassles of healthcare reform, 34% of physicians say they plan to leave the practice of medicine over the next decade, according to a new national survey." So, first of all, there's no breakdown of the reasons physicians give for why they are leaving. Maybe it's low compensation. Second of all, 34% is on the low end of your range. Third, and most decisively, it says nothing about private practice GP offices.
This article cannot be used to support your claim.
Source #3: This source says only that "83 percent of physicians surveyed are thinking of quitting because of Obamacare," and it says absolutely nothing about how many will actually quit. In fact, the study discussed in source #3 is specifically mentioned as one of those discredited in this article linked to by your own source #4. So, source #3 does not support your claim.
Source #4: There isn't a single sentence of source #4 that supports your claim. It provides some information about how some surveys, such as those cited in your source #3, have been discredited, and the rest of the article has no bearing on the discussion of whether the number of GP offices will be reduced, and if so by how much.
Source #5: Why, that's the same as source #4!
Not a single one of the sources you provided supports your claim. One was actually debunked by one of your own sources.