• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Question about the ending of "Zero Hour"

Then why perfect cubes and spheres? Instead of a "glob?"

For the Borg, I would assume only efficiency considerations would count. Not 'fashion' or such.

A sphere is a shape that optimises internal volume relative to surface area, (and other characteristics such as minimizing maximum distance between any two points in the vessel). As for a cube, who knows? Ease of compartimentalisation?
 
Last edited:
I can actually picture that working for the Borg. Cubes docking together and stacking for ease of moving around....

Well, they tried a couple of stacked-cube shapes. Long I pieces, some L's, some S-shaped zig-zags, this T, a bigger cube. Problem was when they'd assemble for an even bigger task the whole row of ships would just disappear.
 
And why the Queen got rid of unimatrix Zero wasn't because of it existing it was because the other Borg found out about sexy time. She got nervous.
 
I know it's off topic now (or on topic? :confused:) but the end of Zero Hour totally detracted from the awesome conclusion of the Xindi arc.

Having said that, I believe one 'Oh Boy!' from Archer at the very end would have been enough to save it for me :techman:
 
...Something shaped like the Steamrunner would certainly be fitting: giant, no doubt feeble and primitive engines in comparison with the "payload". The Intrepid would be a slight improvement, while the Enterprise would finally get close to the nacelles-to-saucer size ratio familiar from the more advanced eras of Trek.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top