True. I'm aware of the Lower Decks appearances and I have no problem with them, but it's not remotely the same thing as live action.I assume Crewman6 meant in live action, which was their original point in regards to movie appearances.
True. I'm aware of the Lower Decks appearances and I have no problem with them, but it's not remotely the same thing as live action.I assume Crewman6 meant in live action, which was their original point in regards to movie appearances.
And (for me) the LDS appearances were surprisingly respectful, they didn't tear the ending of DS9 open, and they didn't alter the last known trajectory of the characters.
Which would not be the case if any of them had shown up in PIC, that's for sure.
She was a Major for six years, she can be a Colonel for seven.
How long was Kirk a captain? Then he was an Admiral for a couple of weeks and then was a captain some more
How many years after DS9 is Lower Decks set?I enjoyed the DS9 episode of Lower Decks and I agree with you with one exception: Kira should have long since been a general by now. Having her still a colonel feels like a huge insult to the character.
I've seen that scene. Larry Nemecek brought it when he came as our guest in an Italian Star Trek convention.
The scene was supposed to be included among the other deleted scenes in the extra contents of the 2 DVDs special edition of the movie, however they coudn't identify who the two ladies with Quark were. The assistant director (I suppose Jerry Fleck) had died in the meantime and nobody knew who the actresses were. Since they couldn't pay them to be included in the DVDs they had to leave that scene out from the extra contents. This, at least, was what Mr. Nemecek told us. He had a DVD with this scene and another extra banned for legal reason from DS9 season 5 DVD boxset and we screened them both.
Maab
But now I'm curious what the "banned" DS9 extra was!
But now I'm curious what the "banned" DS9 extra was!
As am I!