...Alternately, the Sovereign might have one hypermodern system, possibly installed at the cost of having most other systems be second-rate.
Or then LaForge might simply have been blowing hot air when he claimed the E-E was an advanced vessel. Possibly "advanced" is synonym for "not working yet"?
I appreciate what you are attempting to point out (and I was aware of such a prospect before you even brought it up), but we do know that Hollywood writers don't really like to think in such overly-complicated terms.
They keep things simple, and for the sake of convenience, when they say 'advanced' it means 'superior' and 'more powerful' (unless we are told otherwise).
We're left wanting for some explanation on why Starfleet chose not to have the E-E defend Earth from the Borg. And the explanation can't be "we don't trust Picard", because then Starfleet would simply jail Picard (or execute him, because part of him could still be Locutus and betray the Federation even from jail) and have Riker use the ship for saving Earth again. One possibility is that the E-E was substandard or unfinished; the other, as such sufficient possibility is that the E-E was merely on par with the rest of the fleet, and thus there was no pressing need to send her.
Timo Saloniemi
Why couldn't it be 'we don't trust Picard'?
The Federation does not condone execution for one thing, and they know that while he was Locutus, he was not in control of his actions, so putting him away was not doable (along with the fact he had a reputation in SF in the first place).
The reasons we were given were for the most part psychologically based.
SF wanted to avoid Picard becoming emotionally compromised like he did in that scene with Lilly and smashed the model ships.
Ultimately, I find their decision to be idiotic because shorter term exposure to the Borg (say while their ship is being dispatched) is not going to cause a lapse like the one that was triggered after almost half of the ship and decent amount of crew was assimilated (which would probably affect most SF captains in some way).
Is this canon? What episode was it mentioned in, I haven't watched Voyager in years.
Since you are referring to my statement that Voyager was on equal footing of a Galaxy class ship in everything but physical size, I can tell you that on-screen reference loosely indicates this.
However, the creators of the show and actual blueprints for Voyager show it's weapons and defenses to be the same like the ones on a Galaxy class ship.
Plus it makes sense.
SF was focusing on constructing smaller and more powerful ships in response to the Borg threat.
Look at the Defiant ... it's extremely small, yet packs the firepower that's capable of killing off 3 Jem'Hadaar bug ships in one fight (or shall we saw, only 4 or 5 pulses per bug to destroy it - which was 10x more effective to what a Galaxy class did on it's first encounter with similar ships).
Plus, Voyager was put into service 10 years after the Galaxy class.
Furthermore, luxuries available on the Galaxy class are in smaller quantities onboard Voyager.
Just enough to cater for a crew of say 150, whereas creature comforts on the Galaxy class have to accommodate just over 1000.
That's around 7x fewer power needed for creature comforts alone.
I would find it idiotic of SF to create 'state of the art' starship with defensive and offensive systems of ships that came some 30 years before.
Besides, most people make an error assuming that 'bigger is better' while more often than not we were shown in Trek how such aspects fail on a frequent basis.