Per canon? Unknown. But I thought so at the time. Probably due to having watched Star Trek of Gods and Men
Property of Ambassador Spock [SPOILERS!!!]
- Thread starter WarpFactorZ
- Start date
And apparently a Jem'hadar assault rifle.
I never thought that was a very good "Me" wall.
Needs more Saurian brandy
Sarek was also a full Vulcan.
Never had his Kelvin-verse immunizations.
Ooops. Good point.
Khan got defrosted. played back the Enterprise log found out old Spock told young Spock how to defeat him so paid him a visit..
He got hit by a bus.
Should have looked both ways.
Should have looked both ways.
Did they say how old Spock was when he died?
A bit tricky because...time travel. Add his Prime age to his Kelvin age I guess.
I am pretty sure Spock is referred to as first officer in Court Martial when he takes the stand.
Isn't there a theory that Gary Mitchell was the first officer in Where No Man Has Gone Before? Perhaps Spock hadn't yet been formally promoted to first officer by The Enemy Within to succeed Gary Mitchell, but was later on.
Part of the problem is at least per Star Trek 2009, we don't exactly know what year it was when he went back in time, so we have to rely on a comic book.
The Countdown comic states that the events of that comic in the Prime universe take place 8 years after Nemesis. Nemesis was 2379, so that makes Countdown 2388.According to Memory Alpha, Spock was born in 2230.
So, at the point he goes back in time, he is 158 in Star Trek 2009, and he appears in the year 2258.
The events of Star Trek Into Darkness begin in 2259, which makes Spock 159. By the end of Star Trek Into Darkness, they leap ahead 1 year, making Spock 160.
Star Trek Beyond takes place almost 3 years after the end of Star Trek Into Darkness. So that makes Spock 162, almost 163.
Part of the problem is at least per Star Trek 2009, we don't exactly know what year it was when he went back in time, so we have to rely on a comic book.
2387, or thereabouts.
He states he is from 129 years in the future.
Part of the problem is at least per Star Trek 2009, we don't exactly know what year it was when he went back in time, so we have to rely on a comic book.
According to Memory Alpha, Spock was born in 2230.
So, at the point he goes back in time, he is 158 in Star Trek 2009, and he appears in the year 2258.
The events of Star Trek Into Darkness begin in 2259, which makes Spock 159. By the end of Star Trek Into Darkness, they leap ahead 1 year, making Spock 160.
Star Trek Beyond takes place almost 3 years after the end of Star Trek Into Darkness. So that makes Spock 162, almost 163.
Why doesn't anyone want to factor in the Genesis Planet aging?
Part of the problem is at least per Star Trek 2009, we don't exactly know what year it was when he went back in time, so we have to rely on a comic book.
According to Memory Alpha, Spock was born in 2230.
So, at the point he goes back in time, he is 158 in Star Trek 2009, and he appears in the year 2258.
The events of Star Trek Into Darkness begin in 2259, which makes Spock 159. By the end of Star Trek Into Darkness, they leap ahead 1 year, making Spock 160.
Star Trek Beyond takes place almost 3 years after the end of Star Trek Into Darkness. So that makes Spock 162, almost 163.
Yeah that sounds right. It was only a couple of years ago I saw Willard Scott announcing his birthday on the Today Show.
I don't recall that line, but that does seem to jibe with the comic: 2387 (Nemesis at 2379 +8 years), rather 2388, like I said. Never said I could add!
It doesn't account for chronological age, but you know you have a very good point.
Who is to say that Spock's body didn't age more, with the Genesis Planet than his chronological age. Physically speaking, Spock could have actually been closer to 200.
