• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Prometheus and warp cores?

I think it's more along the lines of Voyager has one warp core, and the pretty cutaway diagram at the back of the bridge is meant to look pretty but has no actual bearing on anything at all.
True enough, although a MSD would presumably be pretty definitive - having a cutaway diagram proudly calling itself the 'Master Systems Display' showing bits of equipment and systems that don't exist seems pretty self-defeating to my mind.
 
One wonders how flexible that MSD "really" is. I mean, in the real world it's just painted on, but for the Prometheus one would think that it would be animated enough to show separation when the ship did separate.

Today, it wouldn't be at all unexpected if a display like that failed to correspond exactly to the physical reality. Software is always outdated, after all. And it would be way too much hassle to reprogram the display to show the lack of a second warp core or an aeroshuttle. But one'd hope the 24th century would be a bit different.

Timo Saloniemi
 
In which case, that MSD we see every week is hopelessly misleading! What other stuff is featured on it that isn't actually there I wonder?
 
Indeed! Are the MSDs actually an accurate guide to anything?

It would certainly help clear up the controversy about the Defiant's decks and size if the MSD were nothing more than wall art for the bridge! ;)
 
IIRC the pattern of the Warp Core changes during the series? Maybe this is them changing to the other core?
 
In which case, that MSD we see every week is hopelessly misleading!
In the case of the one on the Voyager's bridge, it clearly visible behind Janeway when she is speaking to potential opponents.

It's ... a ... fake.

Design to fool Janeway's many enemies into shooting at the wrong parts of the ship in hopes of hitting something vital.

:)
 
Technically, at least a few decades prior to TOS. Or STXI would have been about JTK growing up to command Medical Shuttle 47:)
 
Well, if those aren't blue glowing warp nacelles on the shuttles, why do they have red impulse engines on the pylons, just like Voyager's shuttles? Screenshot here. You could say they're meant to be something else that just happens to look the same... but what'd be the point?
 
Do we have any indication those're impulse engines? They might just as well be positioning lights.
 
I'm not arguing whether those Star Trek IX shuttles have warp or not - I'm just saying that using the fact that the survivors made it back to Earth as evidence that the shuttles are warp-capable seems a bit flawed given that their distress signals could have seen them picked up by another Starfleet ship within days or weeks.
 
Technically, at least a few decades prior to TOS. Or STXI would have been about JTK growing up to command Medical Shuttle 47:)
Which begs the question, why didn't they go to warp fairly quickly after leaving the flight deck of the Kelvin?

Instead of puttering along and allowing the Narada to take potshots at them? A minute
or more after their launch (and the Kelvin's ramming of the Narada), they were still to be seen at sublight speed.

A vessel design to be used to abandon ship under combat conditions, provided it had warp capabilities, would do so as soon as possible, to avoid presenting the enemy with a target.

The Kelvin's shuttles were sublight only.

:)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top