But why would the Nexus echo of Kirk age twenty years? After all, time is supposed to have no meaning in the Nexus.
But why would the Nexus echo of Kirk age twenty years? After all, time is supposed to have no meaning in the Nexus.
Q snaps his fingers.
Kidding! I think.
I don't think it's the same...Kirk didn't leave an echo behind, because he wasn't "pulled...ripped away" from the Nexus like Guinan was (the Enterprise-B's transporter tried to beam her out but it didn't work). Kirk left completely, of his own free will.
IMO there should be an echo either way.
But why would the Nexus echo of Kirk age twenty years? After all, time is supposed to have no meaning in the Nexus.
Yeah, scrap the Nexus. I just don't want to see it on screen again. Or hear it used on screen as a means to bring a character back. I really don't expect the writers to go back to that well, given the mixed fan base reaction to GEN.
She explained that her echo was there precisely because of the transporter 'ripping' her away.
As for the nexus, it wanders through our solar system every 39.2 years so Pine goes in for some reason and meets his older self played by Shatner who warns him about Khan or some other threat.
By the way, why did no one in the 23rd century or the 24th century know about the nexus when it comes around to our solar system every 39.2 years? This is one of the major plot flaws that makes GEN such a poor film.
It would be cool if Shatner played old Kirk from the Mirror Universe, who was transported into the past of an alternate dimension by his own Tantalus field device, and marooned there for 50 years.
I don't think it's the same...Kirk didn't leave an echo behind, because he wasn't "pulled...ripped away" from the Nexus like Guinan was (the Enterprise-B's transporter tried to beam her out but it didn't work). Kirk left completely, of his own free will.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.