I had not previously encountered the data that gravity was strongest around a planet's equator. This is an interesting effect which would seem to defeat the three-dimensionality you were describing, however: if planetary rings can pick out a preferred direction, why can't a subspace shock wave?Trekker4747 said:
Because, and this is coming from IIRC, planetary rings are dust, rocks, and other space shumutz captured in a planet's gravity and since gravity is strongest at the equator planetary rings are along that plane.
Explosions, however, occur 3-Dimensionaly.
I should be interested to know if you have a guess why accretion disc jets tend to be very nearly linear instead of three-dimensional. And for that matter why it is the Homonuculus Nebula which has formed around Eta Carinae since its (observed in) 1843 eruption is remarkably not spherical (although it does look to my untrained eye like the (1, 0) spherical harmonic).
I'm curious what direction the debris flies out of when a high-speed turbine comes apart and destroys the engine in which it's housed.This was a building/plant that blew up on the planet's surface. It would've been a 3-dimensional explosion (as partialy evidenced that it took half the planet with it) and not of had a shockwave that traveled along a plane. A plane that conviently exsisted on the same one as Excelsior. It's the common mistake of Trek's creative staff thinking two-dimensionaly.
As for the plane conveniently being in line with Excelsior, it has to catch somebody or else the story hasn't got any way to start. Or was it outrageous that of the entire Federation to come in from Vejur should happen to pass by a com station and the Rama Whale Probe happens to pass by Saratoga? And those would be tracing out, essentially, lines in space rather than a plane; Vejur and Probe had an infinitely smaller chance of appearing in range of some Federation article.