The second thing, of course, was the bad science. Why is it that everyone who makes an asteroid or meteor movie is ten times as ignorant as the people who make the usual bad movies? When a studio decides to make an asteroid or meteor movie do they put out ads for Voc Tech dropouts or something? We have a main belt asteroid that was split in half by a comet and deflected to a collision course with Earth and made it here in a couple of days, which means it had to be moving faster than anything else in the Solar System; then when it got here, it took a half an hour to get from the space station to the atmosphere.

And after they announced it was entering the atmosphere, which would have put it about a minute from impact, they announced that it was entering Earth's gravitational field. And they were going to save the world by blowing up this asteroid with nuclear weapons after it had entered the atmosphere. But at the last possible second, they were able to divert the nuclear missiles of at least three nations while in flight to put a little English on the thing and spin it safely out of the atmosphere again (not even mentioning that if this could possibly happen the asteroid would intersect Earth's orbit again in the same place one year later); and, somehow, this last-minute trick eliminated all fallout from these nuclear explosions. I could find a sportswriter from the
Herald who is more scientifically literate than that.