• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poorly treated characters

Will the "The Struggle Within" be in a novel format eventually? Amazon has it as a ebook so I was just wondering.
 
Will the "The Struggle Within" be in a novel format eventually? Amazon has it as a ebook so I was just wondering.

Well, it can't be a novel, because it's only 25,000 words long, novella-length. If you mean to ask whether it'll ever be published as a physical book, I'm aware of no current plans for that, and it seems unlikely at this time. If there's ever an omnibus of the Typhon Pact series, it might be included there. Or if it sells well enough to warrant further original eBooks, there could eventually be collections of those as there have been for SCE and Mere Anarchy. But as things stand now, the only way to read this novella will be as an eBook.
 
^ While I have to admit I'll totally pay for it, it is damn annoying they're charging almost-novel price for something less than a third of a normal novel.
 
^ While I have to admit I'll totally pay for it, it is damn annoying they're charging almost-novel price for something less than a third of a normal novel.

Some movies are just over an hour long, and some are over three. Doesn't necessarily alter the ticket price at the cinema.
 
^ So?

I'm a fast reader; why is it not valid for me to be a little frustrated about spending $6 on less than an hour of reading?
 
Hands down it has to be Janeway. Quite frankly, if my only exposure to the character was via Trek Lit then I wouldn't be a fan myself.

So true. It seems that the Trek Lit writers have decided that Janeway's erratic behavior in two or three episodes are so important that they render her more positive qualities insignificant. What about the Janeway we saw in the other 167 episodes?

"Yeah, but, officer, what about all those people I didn't brutally murder?"

Sometimes, the gravity of a few isolated decisions is simply too great not to outweigh the rest of one's choices.

I'm not so sure I agree with this comment, especially if there are extenuating circumstances that can explain why the character makes those isolated decisions. If a character is pushed beyond the pale by a situation, he/she may act in a way that is totally out of character because of the pressure they feel. Most humans are capable of committing horrible atrocities when pushed too far, but that doesn't mean that they are, from then on, terrible people.

I admit that the writers didn't always make it clear why Janeway makes some of the decisions she does, but most of the time, there is justification. When Janeway discovers that aliens are treating her crew like lab rats and anticipating killing many of them (Scientific Method), she takes the ship through a binary star to force the aliens to leave them alone. This is not an action she would have considered taking under normal circumstances. And the admiral's actions are not the captain's; in fact, Captain Janeway was horrified by what her older self had done. She only acted on it because it was a fait accompli.

Letting those rare lapses in behavior have more influence than the "normal" character we see over seven years of the series is an unfair distortion and oversimplification. If your claim is true, then Sisko's actions to poison the Maquis planet should outweigh his other better qualities, and Archer's deliberate torture of a prisoner should also have more sway than his other better qualities.
 
I dunno, the way Deanna Troi was portrayed when she was pregnant, all emo and self absorbed was pretty bad.

"Emo?" She was grieving after losing her first baby to a miscarriage! She'd discovered that her second baby was guaranteed to die the same way! Nothing could possibly be more tragic and horrible to go through. How can you not understand that? "Emo?" That's like saying that "Chain of Command" portrayed Picard badly because he got "whiny" about being tortured.

And yet she never sounded like an adult woman, but rather a whiny teenager.
 
Letting those rare lapses in behavior have more influence than the "normal" character we see over seven years of the series is an unfair distortion and oversimplification. If your claim is true, then Sisko's actions to poison the Maquis planet should outweigh his other better qualities, and Archer's deliberate torture of a prisoner should also have more sway than his other better qualities.

Yeah I was going to say the same about Sisko, and good point about Archer. With these leaders the lapses are seen as showing them to be human, giving them character. With Janeway they lapses are elevated to proof of her being a psycho.
 
And yet she never sounded like an adult woman, but rather a whiny teenager.

In your opinion. To me, she was very believably sold as a mother who'd lost one child years before, had another miscarriage, and despite how irrational she knew it to be, couldn't bring herself to let go of another.
 
Letting those rare lapses in behavior have more influence than the "normal" character we see over seven years of the series is an unfair distortion and oversimplification.

But as I said already, that is not what String Theory: Evolution actually says. It says that she may rarely have mood swings for no apparent reason, but that her ability to command will not be compromised. So to say they "have more influence" is a categorically false characterization. It's made quite explicit that it would be a minor, infrequent variation in her normal behavior.
 
So true. It seems that the Trek Lit writers have decided that Janeway's erratic behavior in two or three episodes are so important that they render her more positive qualities insignificant. What about the Janeway we saw in the other 167 episodes?

"Yeah, but, officer, what about all those people I didn't brutally murder?"

Sometimes, the gravity of a few isolated decisions is simply too great not to outweigh the rest of one's choices.

I'm not so sure I agree with this comment, especially if there are extenuating circumstances that can explain why the character makes those isolated decisions. If a character is pushed beyond the pale by a situation, he/she may act in a way that is totally out of character because of the pressure they feel. Most humans are capable of committing horrible atrocities when pushed too far, but that doesn't mean that they are, from then on, terrible people.

I admit that the writers didn't always make it clear why Janeway makes some of the decisions she does, but most of the time, there is justification. When Janeway discovers that aliens are treating her crew like lab rats and anticipating killing many of them (Scientific Method), she takes the ship through a binary star to force the aliens to leave them alone. This is not an action she would have considered taking under normal circumstances. And the admiral's actions are not the captain's; in fact, Captain Janeway was horrified by what her older self had done. She only acted on it because it was a fait accompli.

Letting those rare lapses in behavior have more influence than the "normal" character we see over seven years of the series is an unfair distortion and oversimplification. If your claim is true, then Sisko's actions to poison the Maquis planet should outweigh his other better qualities, and Archer's deliberate torture of a prisoner should also have more sway than his other better qualities.

I actually don't have a particularly strong opinion about those particular moments in Janeway's character evolution. My objection is to the basic principle that aberrations in typical behavior should never be seen as outweighing the normal pattern.

That's often true, but it is not always true. Some aberrations in behavior should be given more weight, more importance, than the normal pattern. If you rape a child, you can't point to all the children you didn't rape and say that you shouldn't therefore be judged a child molester. If you extort money, you can't point to all the people you didn't blackmail and say you shouldn't be called an extortionist. Etc.

Does that mean that Janeway's questionable decisions should outweigh her normal behavior? I don't know. But I don't think we should throw out the idea that outliers from one's normal behavior are automatically outweighed by the standard pattern.
 
Letting those rare lapses in behavior have more influence than the "normal" character we see over seven years of the series is an unfair distortion and oversimplification.

But as I said already, that is not what String Theory: Evolution actually says. It says that she may rarely have mood swings for no apparent reason, but that her ability to command will not be compromised. So to say they "have more influence" is a categorically false characterization. It's made quite explicit that it would be a minor, infrequent variation in her normal behavior.

I'm not just talking about String Theory, although I didn't recognize Janeway in the character as presented there. I'm saying that the PB Janeway (and I've read all the VOY up to Full Circle) tends to exhibit those qualities that come from her more "drastic" decisions. She seems arrogant, egotistical (refusing to take advice), inflexible (unwilling to bend the SF rules), and totally lacking in humor or humility. The Janeway I saw on the screen was warm, funny, involved, serious, careful, and dedicated. She took the time to sit down and eat fruit along the way, as Harry reported in "Coda." She spoiled her crew by letting them take shuttles out to meditate, revisit near-death experiences to solve personal issues, visit Jupiter station to help heal Zimmerman, on and on. This kinder, softer Janeway seldom, if ever appear in the novels, and I can only assume it is because the editors/writers have chosen to focus on the stressed and desperate captain who made questionable decisions under duress.
 
^ You really still think that's true in Full Circle? I'll admit you usually have a point, but I thought there was some great Janeway stuff in that novel.
 
Blimey, over a hundred posts and no one mentioned Tiris Jast yet? Surely she's the one who got the worst treatment, since she was introduced and then killed, only to later appear in a comic that hardly anybody seemed to like at the time.
 
I thought that Admiral Willem Batiste from the Voyager relaunch got rather short shrift.
In my head I had rather lazily cast Willem Defoe as Batiste(see what I did there?)and had ,probably prematurely imbued Batiste with Defoe's wolfish charm.I had looked forward to a new dynamic in the Voyager realm,pitting Chakotay against the maverick Batiste.Unfortunately the character was rather hastily despatched in what IMO,was a rather implausible plotline.
Oh well,Voyager has it seems settled into it's usual female captain/Chakotay status-quo,proving that seven years of piss-poor television doesn't really teach many lessons.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top