Are you talking about geting along with his fake son?
What fake son? In the current novel continuity, Picard and his wife Beverly have a real son, Rene, who was conceived near the end of Greater Than the Sum and is a bit over a year old as of Paths of Disharmony and The Struggle Within.
Will the "The Struggle Within" be in a novel format eventually? Amazon has it as a ebook so I was just wondering.
^ While I have to admit I'll totally pay for it, it is damn annoying they're charging almost-novel price for something less than a third of a normal novel.
Hands down it has to be Janeway. Quite frankly, if my only exposure to the character was via Trek Lit then I wouldn't be a fan myself.
So true. It seems that the Trek Lit writers have decided that Janeway's erratic behavior in two or three episodes are so important that they render her more positive qualities insignificant. What about the Janeway we saw in the other 167 episodes?
"Yeah, but, officer, what about all those people I didn't brutally murder?"
Sometimes, the gravity of a few isolated decisions is simply too great not to outweigh the rest of one's choices.
I dunno, the way Deanna Troi was portrayed when she was pregnant, all emo and self absorbed was pretty bad.
"Emo?" She was grieving after losing her first baby to a miscarriage! She'd discovered that her second baby was guaranteed to die the same way! Nothing could possibly be more tragic and horrible to go through. How can you not understand that? "Emo?" That's like saying that "Chain of Command" portrayed Picard badly because he got "whiny" about being tortured.
Letting those rare lapses in behavior have more influence than the "normal" character we see over seven years of the series is an unfair distortion and oversimplification. If your claim is true, then Sisko's actions to poison the Maquis planet should outweigh his other better qualities, and Archer's deliberate torture of a prisoner should also have more sway than his other better qualities.
And yet she never sounded like an adult woman, but rather a whiny teenager.
Letting those rare lapses in behavior have more influence than the "normal" character we see over seven years of the series is an unfair distortion and oversimplification.
So true. It seems that the Trek Lit writers have decided that Janeway's erratic behavior in two or three episodes are so important that they render her more positive qualities insignificant. What about the Janeway we saw in the other 167 episodes?
"Yeah, but, officer, what about all those people I didn't brutally murder?"
Sometimes, the gravity of a few isolated decisions is simply too great not to outweigh the rest of one's choices.
I'm not so sure I agree with this comment, especially if there are extenuating circumstances that can explain why the character makes those isolated decisions. If a character is pushed beyond the pale by a situation, he/she may act in a way that is totally out of character because of the pressure they feel. Most humans are capable of committing horrible atrocities when pushed too far, but that doesn't mean that they are, from then on, terrible people.
I admit that the writers didn't always make it clear why Janeway makes some of the decisions she does, but most of the time, there is justification. When Janeway discovers that aliens are treating her crew like lab rats and anticipating killing many of them (Scientific Method), she takes the ship through a binary star to force the aliens to leave them alone. This is not an action she would have considered taking under normal circumstances. And the admiral's actions are not the captain's; in fact, Captain Janeway was horrified by what her older self had done. She only acted on it because it was a fait accompli.
Letting those rare lapses in behavior have more influence than the "normal" character we see over seven years of the series is an unfair distortion and oversimplification. If your claim is true, then Sisko's actions to poison the Maquis planet should outweigh his other better qualities, and Archer's deliberate torture of a prisoner should also have more sway than his other better qualities.
Letting those rare lapses in behavior have more influence than the "normal" character we see over seven years of the series is an unfair distortion and oversimplification.
But as I said already, that is not what String Theory: Evolution actually says. It says that she may rarely have mood swings for no apparent reason, but that her ability to command will not be compromised. So to say they "have more influence" is a categorically false characterization. It's made quite explicit that it would be a minor, infrequent variation in her normal behavior.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.