http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2014/06/many-moons-of-pluto.html
Go the little guy.This week, amid so much discouraging news of irredentist militias and unrepentant neocons, there was a small bit of news that might cheer people up, at least a little: Pluto, it seems, may be accepted back into the club of planets. It got kicked out, you will recall, eight years ago, when the I.A.U.—the International Astronomical Union, which exists to hold elections on these things—voted it out. It was too remote, too lonely, and generally too slovenly in its behavior to count as a planet. It even—lovely, incriminating phrase—failed to “clear the neighborhood around its orbit.” (And there seemed to be other even larger similar objects out beyond it.) It was demoted to a “dwarf planet,” and became a mere “Trans-Neptunian object.”
Now, though, Pluto has been discovered to have several moons, in regular orbit around it. It was already known to have three when it was de-listed, but the Hubble Space Telescope has since found two more. “Many Moons” was the title of James Thurber’s finest fable, and actually having many moons, apparently, helps make you a planet in the eyes of people on other ones, as having children was once said to make you an adult. One’s planetary distinction is redeemed, by this measure, by the clear presence of the orbit of the littler ones around you. And it could be a vindication for Pluto-lovers, too, a group who turn out to be more numerous than seems quite plausible. As you discover sifting through astronomical chat groups, the original decision to kick Pluto out of the planetary club was met with hysterical resistance, not to say resentment. Indeed, the state of Illinois decided, on its own, in 2009, to reinstate Pluto as a planet—making Pluto a planet when seen from Wrigley Field, merely a sub-Neptunian object across the way in Gary.