^You're just convincing me that my "Section 31 spoofed the Reliant's computer banks to make them think V was VI" may be the only explanation that works.
^You're just convincing me that my "Section 31 spoofed the Reliant's computer banks to make them think V was VI" may be the only explanation that works.
Actually, that's not a bad theory.![]()
^You're just convincing me that my "Section 31 spoofed the Reliant's computer banks to make them think V was VI" may be the only explanation that works.
Actually, that's not a bad theory.![]()
Until you ask, ``and why would they do that, exactly?'' and sit through the awkward, unconvincing silence that follows.
So they can weaponize it.^You're just convincing me that my "Section 31 spoofed the Reliant's computer banks to make them think V was VI" may be the only explanation that works.
Actually, that's not a bad theory.![]()
Until you ask, ``and why would they do that, exactly?''
So Christopher...given your not-unjustified criticisms of TWOK's implausibilities, I'm curious...what do you think of the film as a film? I mean, do you look past the issues and enjoy it, or are they glaring enough for you that in the end you feel they significantly detract from the overall product?
So they can weaponize it.Actually, that's not a bad theory.![]()
Until you ask, ``and why would they do that, exactly?''
[ ... ]
tl;dr The only way the hawks in Starfleet could get away with weaponizing Genesis is if they arranged for someone to steal it. Nobody in Starfleet would go along with that, but a megalomaniac who's always wanted to rule his own planet would make a convenient patsy. And if it just so happens that Khan's use of Genesis nerfed an entire civilization? That's just proof that Genesis is too dangerous to fall into the wrong hands.
So Christopher...given your not-unjustified criticisms of TWOK's implausibilities, I'm curious...what do you think of the film as a film? I mean, do you look past the issues and enjoy it, or are they glaring enough for you that in the end you feel they significantly detract from the overall product?
I think it's an utterly stupid, cornily melodramatic, needlessly gory, implausibly retro piece of nonsense. I find it sluggishly directed and tedious, and I say that as someone who enjoys the leisurely pace of ST:TMP. I think it undermined cinematic Star Trek badly by tossing out the intelligence and naturalism that the franchise had previously aspired to in favor of absurd plotting and over-the-top, exaggerated melodrama. I think it squandered the potential of "Space Seed"s ending and wasted Khan as a character by reducing him from a brilliant aspiring conqueror to a vengeance-crazed lunatic. I think its visuals, music, and style totally lack the elegance and grandeur of TMP, and that the whole thing is operating on a lesser level all around; it's basically a TV movie dressed up with feature-quality opticals. The best thing I can say about it is that at least it isn't The Final Frontier.
Oddly, I rather like The Search for Spock, even though it has many of the same deficits of plausibility and sense and production values. I'm not entirely sure why that is, but it's largely because I really like the dialogue in TSFS; it's really rather lyrical. And maybe it's partly because it wasn't a huge letdown from its predecessor the way TWOK was vis-a-vis TMP.
But getting access to and weaponizing Genesis is the EASY part; it's not even a challenge for them.So they can weaponize it.Until you ask, ``and why would they do that, exactly?''
[ ... ]
tl;dr The only way the hawks in Starfleet could get away with weaponizing Genesis is if they arranged for someone to steal it. Nobody in Starfleet would go along with that, but a megalomaniac who's always wanted to rule his own planet would make a convenient patsy. And if it just so happens that Khan's use of Genesis nerfed an entire civilization? That's just proof that Genesis is too dangerous to fall into the wrong hands.
Doesn't parse. If Section 31 wants to weaponize Genesis, they can do so by letting the Project finish its work, copy the database, and then make the weaponization one of their dark-budget projects.
Well yes, and they COULD have just gone in there and straight murdered everyone and walked away with Genesis. But that's not really the way Section 31's style: they never actually kill anyone, they just arrange "coincidences" that cause their enemies to BE killed at convenient moments. They're an espionage unit, not a death squad.If Section 31 wants to tank Genesis so that no one can finish, much less weaponize, it (a refreshing change of pace for evil top-secret organizations), they can slip a bomb into a storage container and classify the remains.
And they didn't have to do any of the bullshit they pulled in "Affliction" either. Or for that matter Inter Arma.They don't have to trick Reliant into going to the wrong planet, getting captured by Khan, and trusting Khan will follow their predicted script rather than do something novel like, oh, hold Earth for ransom or sell the thing to the Tholians. They can get what they want with less effort.
So Christopher...given your not-unjustified criticisms of TWOK's implausibilities, I'm curious...what do you think of the film as a film? I mean, do you look past the issues and enjoy it, or are they glaring enough for you that in the end you feel they significantly detract from the overall product?
I think it's an utterly stupid, cornily melodramatic, needlessly gory, implausibly retro piece of nonsense. I find it sluggishly directed and tedious, and I say that as someone who enjoys the leisurely pace of ST:TMP. I think it undermined cinematic Star Trek badly by tossing out the intelligence and naturalism that the franchise had previously aspired to in favor of absurd plotting and over-the-top, exaggerated melodrama. I think it squandered the potential of "Space Seed"s ending and wasted Khan as a character by reducing him from a brilliant aspiring conqueror to a vengeance-crazed lunatic. I think its visuals, music, and style totally lack the elegance and grandeur of TMP, and that the whole thing is operating on a lesser level all around; it's basically a TV movie dressed up with feature-quality opticals. The best thing I can say about it is that at least it isn't The Final Frontier.
Oddly, I rather like The Search for Spock, even though it has many of the same deficits of plausibility and sense and production values. I'm not entirely sure why that is, but it's largely because I really like the dialogue in TSFS; it's really rather lyrical. And maybe it's partly because it wasn't a huge letdown from its predecessor the way TWOK was vis-a-vis TMP.
So Christopher...given your not-unjustified criticisms of TWOK's implausibilities, I'm curious...what do you think of the film as a film? I mean, do you look past the issues and enjoy it, or are they glaring enough for you that in the end you feel they significantly detract from the overall product?
I think it's an utterly stupid, cornily melodramatic, needlessly gory, implausibly retro piece of nonsense. I find it sluggishly directed and tedious, and I say that as someone who enjoys the leisurely pace of ST:TMP. I think it undermined cinematic Star Trek badly by tossing out the intelligence and naturalism that the franchise had previously aspired to in favor of absurd plotting and over-the-top, exaggerated melodrama. I think it squandered the potential of "Space Seed"s ending and wasted Khan as a character by reducing him from a brilliant aspiring conqueror to a vengeance-crazed lunatic. I think its visuals, music, and style totally lack the elegance and grandeur of TMP, and that the whole thing is operating on a lesser level all around; it's basically a TV movie dressed up with feature-quality opticals. The best thing I can say about it is that at least it isn't The Final Frontier.
Oddly, I rather like The Search for Spock, even though it has many of the same deficits of plausibility and sense and production values. I'm not entirely sure why that is, but it's largely because I really like the dialogue in TSFS; it's really rather lyrical. And maybe it's partly because it wasn't a huge letdown from its predecessor the way TWOK was vis-a-vis TMP.
Doesn't parse. If Section 31 wants to weaponize Genesis, they can do so by letting the Project finish its work, copy the database, and then make the weaponization one of their dark-budget projects.
Out of curiosity can I ask what you think of Into Darkness?
David had no interest in stopping Genesis.
And more simply, sensors did not work, transporters cant be used without sensors. IF your ship cant target an enemy ship using computer based sensors, then the computer based sensors cant be used to use a transporter. No one wants to end up in a wall when they rematerialize.
When Kirk gets to see the planetoid jungle, I am certain that he is told that another test of the genesis device was in heavy doubt due to heavy resistance from star fleet command.
Even the VISUAL SENSORS that put a pretty external picture on the main viewer were barely functional.
I recall a series of early trek novels that stated the transporter created a miniature stasis field around a person to keep them from moving during transport
It was due to I think the transporter couldn't compensate for motion.
Voyager was the first series where the ship could beam aboard moving shuttles.
When David says "You can't", he may actually be saying "You can't beam over", and Jim understands (from earlier discussions of the theory with Carol or from consulting the brochures) that you can't do anything else with "beam" in it, either.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.