Inconceivable!You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Inconceivable!You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Except for STAR TREK: Strange New Worlds that has the first onscreen Starship Captain character of Christopher Pike (and Number One, Spock and Uhura).
Which has absolutely nothing to do with what I wrote.
I've had the feeling for weeks now that come Thursday we'll get something bittersweet. I never thought of The Last Generation as being the send off for all of Trek, not just the TNG cast, but I suspect you're right. This last season of Picard represents the last little bit of Trek that was touched by Roddenberry's hand.
Except for STAR TREK: Strange New Worlds that has the first onscreen Starship Captain character of Christopher Pike (and Number One, Spock and Uhura).
Uh, i mean it LITERALLY does
Roddenberry wrote “The Cage” which was the basis for Strange New Worlds.
WTF, we're doing apostolic succession for Star Trek now? And I thought the canon arguments were getting silly.It 'literally' does not.
TNG was the most involved Roddenberry had been in Trek since 1978. He 'literally' wrote the series bible for TNG. He 'literally' hired Rick Berman. He 'literally' approved all the actors that were hired for the TNG cast. And after his death Berman continued to largely govern Trek the same, continuing through three more series and four motion pictures. And When Enterprise ended in 2005 the very last of any Star Trek that was "touched by Roddenberry's hand" ended with it.
Which is completely irrelevant to what I said. Roddenberry never wrote a single word of dialog for any series after TNG. Yet DS9, VOY, and ENT are far more closely related to him than SNW can ever hope to be. A few characters loosely based on a 58 year old script hardly qualifies.
I find something really ironic in holding up the one series as the true manifestation of Gene's will that not only had him sidelined and forced out of its production before his death but also made direct steps to refute key parts of his messaging (see "no mourning death in the future" etc) throughout its run.
And of course, there's still the uncomfortable issue of just how much of Gene's input was actually his word and not just whatever Leonard Maizlish said he wanted.
Yeah, it all reminds me very much of actual religious history.
everyone gets a voice in fandom but the crazies shout the loudest, leading to bizarre stuff like this latest fan theology an the Cult of Matalas.I find something really ironic in holding up the one series as the true manifestation of Gene's will that not only had him sidelined and forced out of its production before his death but also made direct steps to refute key parts of his messaging (see "no mourning death in the future" etc) throughout its run.
And of course, there's still the uncomfortable issue of just how much of Gene's input was actually his word and not just whatever Leonard Maizlish said he wanted.
Yeah, it all reminds me very much of actual religious history.
No, it ended when he died during TNG's run.the very last of any Star Trek that was "touched by Roddenberry's hand" ended with it.
I find something really ironic in holding up the one series as the true manifestation of Gene's will that not only had him sidelined and forced out of its production before his death but also made direct steps to refute key parts of his messaging (see "no mourning death in the future" etc) throughout its run.
And of course, there's still the uncomfortable issue of just how much of Gene's input was actually his word and not just whatever Leonard Maizlish said he wanted.
Yeah, it all reminds me very much of actual religious history.
Gene Roddenberry is the Bob Kane of Star Trek. Especially from 1987 to 1991.He was off of TOS pretty quickly too.
Basically, if you go down that path, only TMP is True Gene Trek (TM) xD.
Sad to say DC Fontana and David Gerrold really deserved co-creator credit on TNG. It's really interesting to consider the road not taken had Miazlish not cleared out all the legacy TOS people, leaving the door open for Rick Berman and Maurice Hurley to take over.David Gerrold wrote the TNG Series Bible, and -- when watching first season episodes -- you really have to know Gene Roddenberry's writing style to be able to tell where Gene Roddenberry ends and Leonard Miazlish begins. The worse the writing, and the clunkier it sounds, the more likely it's Miazlish. Since he wasn't a creative type. The more philosophical it sounds, or the more TOS-like it sounds, it's probably Roddenberry.
Imagine all the behind the scenes books about the current era when NDAs begin to expire...Sorry, there's just a lot to keep track of.
TNG *is* the last. No two ways. What we think of as ‘Berman’ Trek, is actually the last of ‘Gene’ Trek, insofar as it all grows from TNG directly, with overlap of cast and crew (in series terms, DS9 was the last time characters Gene was directly involved with were series regulars, but Enterprise ended with Frakes and Sirtis though they weren’t series regulars of course) and in that sense *this* very much is the end of Treks ‘primary source’ era that started in 66, then restarted in 79 and settled in 87.
I understand your argument here, but everyone keeps making it about the cast. It has nothing to do with the cast.
From 1993 to 2005 almost every element of Trek we saw on screen had at least some tie back to Gene and the universe of the 24th century established for TNG.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.