It's not the frequency; Goodfellas this book was not. It's the way it was used, particularlythat was a little silly. It was like the author was saying, "Look! We can totally say the f word now!" Nothing to clutch the pearls about, just a little gratuitous.in Maddox's breakdown scene
I've begun reading the book now (thanks, library), and I don't find the use of profanity excessive or distracting. It's a pretty typical level of profanity for a story that reflects how people actually talk rather than censoring it -- rather mild, if anything -- and I don't see lack of censorship as a negative. I mean, it's not like they're swearing every fifth word; it's in moments of strong emotion or emphatic expression, where it's logical and appropriate to use it.
And all this "It's too adult for Star Trek" talk is incongruous to me. Star Trek was the raciest, most daring, most adult SFTV show in the '60s. It fought to have Kirk say "Let's get the hell out of here" at a time when you weren't allowed to use "hell" or "damn" as a curse word on TV (though they were allowed in non-expletive contexts like "a devil straight out of Hell," "hell-for-leather," or "The evidence is damning"). That was the equivalent of a show today getting away with using the F-word on commercial TV, because of how the standards have shifted.
I can only surmise that the UFP's resources have been diminished since it's less than a decade after the Dominion War and they've stretched themselves thin with rebuilding their own worlds as well as Cardassia.
Keep in mind that Picard was advised that the Enterprise was seen as too symbolic of past hostility with the Romulans, so bringing a lot of his crew along on a different ship would've seemed like a token gesture. As for Crusher, the book does imply that they never got together, but if they did get involved and then broke up, maybe it would explain why he's uncomfortable asking her to join him. Or maybe she actually has career goals of her own and isn't just an extension of his life.
Whereas I'm glad to see a Trek story that acknowledges that, realistically, military officers usually don't stick together on the same ship like family for decades on end. They move from assignment to assignment, crew to crew, and that's the normal way for it to work.
And of course, as Brendan said, this book is written to tie into Picard, not to be a sop to TNG nostalgia. And that means its priority should be on exploring the characters and situations specific to Picard, giving us more insight on people like Raffi and Jurati and Elnor and concepts like the evacuation fleet and the synths and the Federation backlash to Picard's work. This book doesn't need to tell us about the TNG characters, because we already know those characters intimately. This book is about the people and things we don't already know about.
I felt the same. I think a lot of of this is related to people's view of Star Trek from a modern perspective, not remembering how edgy things were for their time when it all seems so tame by 21st century standards.
The shows, films, and then the novels have given people a strange impression that it's normal for people to stay with the same duty assignment for decades, when we know from dialogue in all of these media (let alone the real world) that it's not normal. Picard was on Stargazer for even longer, yet he didn't bring a bunch of his crew with him to Enterprise. Kirk was forced off his ship and things had to be especially contrived to get the crew back together in the films. It makes perfect sense when you have an emergency of this type to drop everything and move to the new task. I remember when the Iraq invasion started it's not like they gave us a ton of time to hang out and say good bye, we had to grab our stuff and go.
Didn't it already sell out?
The shows, films, and then the novels have given people a strange impression that it's normal for people to stay with the same duty assignment for decades, when we know from dialogue in all of these media (let alone the real world) that it's not normal.
...no mention of the Titan's involvement--after all at the end of Nemesis it was indicated they were headed to Romulan negotiations--it would seem logical that Riker might be of some help dealing with the Romulans--so perhaps he could be the 2nd character).
Well, to be fair, in the current litverse not much of the crew is still together. Riker and Deanna are gone as is Data. Worf was still first officer but his actions on DS9 have hampered his promotional opportunities (though that appears to be at an end and he would likely be gone soon). Geordi is still there, but he's doing what he loves so in a way that makes sense. And of course he's married to Beverly and she's doing what she loves anyway. Most of the rest of the crew are gone. Ditto for DS9.
And Starfleet isn't a military organization like we have today. It's not out of the realm of possibility some crewmembers may stay together longer than what we might consider normal.
And I'm not advocating that Picard should have lots of TNG elements.
I just thought of Beverly because Picard would want the Enterprise left in trusted hands (Worf) and Riker and Troi are on the Titan (though I'm kind of surprised there's no mention of the Titan's involvement--after all at the end of Nemesis it was indicated they were headed to Romulan negotiations--it would seem logical that Riker might be of some help dealing with the Romulans--so perhaps he could be the 2nd character).
In many ways Star Trek has been an escape from real life. It deals with issues we see today, and always has, but in a way that reflected a more positive future (not perfect, but just more positive). I'm having a harder time getting into Picard because it's a bit too reflective of society today and in some ways it feels no different then if I were to watch the news. And I just personally don't care for shows and movies that are too reflective of today's world.
I read the review by Zinos-Amaro and she raises some interesting points.
And again, if you include Riker and Troi in the novel it goes from being a Picard novel to now having a majority of the TNG cast.
But even if none of them serve together on the Verity, it does seem a bit odd to me that there is hardly a mention of anyone from Picard's old crew. They have subspace communications. It doesn't seem unreasonable that Picard would talk to one of his old crewmates, even if it's just to pick their brain on some problem he needs help with. Picard is one to use all the tools at his disposal.
And the Enterprise and Titan were probably on the vanguard of all that, trying to keep the rest of the known galaxy in one piece while Picard spearheaded the Romulan mission
This might even be before Picard has started assembling most of his team.
And as I said, that wouldn't work as an alternate timeline, since it's too radically different an interpretation of the physics and cosmology of the event.
Besides, I've been trying for years to think up a remotely plausible explanation for the version of the supernova implied by the movie and presented in the comics, but I was never really able to make it work to my satisfaction, because I was stuck with the assumptions made in those sources. By retconning it so it was Romulus's own star and gave years of advance warning, Picard has made it far more plausible than anything I could've come up with under the old assumptions. I'm glad we never had to tell a story about the supernova using that model, because it just didn't work remotely as well as what we have now.
If anything, that's probably why they didn't do what you want. All your suggestions are for scenes at the start of the story. But we already had Picard's decision to leave the Enterprise, the discussion about promoting Worf, the farewell to Crusher, and the recruitment of Geordi. That's a lot of preliminaries already. Tossing in scenes to touch base with Worf and Riker and Troi would've just delayed getting on with the actual plot, and for no actual purpose beyond fanservice.
The show and more so the book give you an out though - the Tal Shiar suppressed everything, maybe even distorted readings visible out with the Romulan system, so no one knew. Until 2387 when Picard tries to save everyone and it goes wrong much quicker.
Or can the dates of the novel verse books be changed? Is that possible?
And I get that this is a prequel to Picard. But both the book and Picard are also sequels to TNG. This book in a sense bridges the gap between Nemesis and Picard. It's supposed to show us how we got from TNG to Picard.
Out of 15 chapters I'm talking about taking maybe 1, tops, as a transitory chapter closing out TNG. It might not even need that much really because you'd be combining a couple things like Worf's promotion and a good bye speech in one scene. So maybe even just 1 or 2% of the total novel. That's more or less what I envisioned.
Still, if it was artificially induced, that means there are many potential timelines where it wouldn't happen
It's not about percentage, it's about placement. Slow starts are a bad thing. The beginning of a story is when you need to capture the audience's attention, when you're most in danger of losing it if you waste time on preliminaries.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.