Perimeter Action Group (PAG)
- Thread starter Handyman
- Start date
- Status
The USS Arbiter, registration NCC-1048
I started this project after reading the book, Ships of the Star Fleet.
I acquired a 3D program and then started modeling the three, perimeter Action ships.
The Akyazi, The Akitsu, NCC-1012 was the first vessel I built.
The Arbiter was the second and I'm about ready to start the Akula next.
I started this project after reading the book, Ships of the Star Fleet.
I acquired a 3D program and then started modeling the three, perimeter Action ships.
The Akyazi, The Akitsu, NCC-1012 was the first vessel I built.
The Arbiter was the second and I'm about ready to start the Akula next.
The Akitsu was a learning experience.
It took forever to build and I was still learning how to use the software.
The Arbiter was much faster as I'd become familiar with the software by then and I could use many of the Akitsu parts with minor or no modifications.
It took forever to build and I was still learning how to use the software.
The Arbiter was much faster as I'd become familiar with the software by then and I could use many of the Akitsu parts with minor or no modifications.
A diversion from the other drawings....
A new USS Arbiter, engineering pod view.
I still need to play with the lighting, tighten up the UV's and add some equipment.
Shown are the upper level, control deck with shield observation window, the lower level mechanics bay, the starboard pylon access doors and the emergency escape pod access doors.
I'll tighten up the lighting and UV's next and then add a lift for deck access and mechanics after.
A new USS Arbiter, engineering pod view.
I still need to play with the lighting, tighten up the UV's and add some equipment.
Shown are the upper level, control deck with shield observation window, the lower level mechanics bay, the starboard pylon access doors and the emergency escape pod access doors.
I'll tighten up the lighting and UV's next and then add a lift for deck access and mechanics after.
LOL!!!
That's funny Bill.
1) These aren't "women". It's a cartoon drawing Bill, based on imagination.
2) I'm not dressing them. I'm embellishing the drawing Bill. They don't get "dressed".
3) Being that they aren't real, they can hardly be "professional" now can they Bill?
4) Considering the drawings as "sex objects" is pretty weird Bill. Don't you think?
5) Getting emotionally caught up to the point of being disgusted by a cartoon is also pretty weird Bill.
Besides. I have it on good authority that the imaginary women in this imaginary world, wear these imaginary outfits for imaginary safety (no loose imaginary clothing getting caught in nasty, imaginary machinery) and for imaginary comfort (they're excellent thermal outfits even if imaginary).
What have you drawn lately Bill?
That's funny Bill.
1) These aren't "women". It's a cartoon drawing Bill, based on imagination.
2) I'm not dressing them. I'm embellishing the drawing Bill. They don't get "dressed".
3) Being that they aren't real, they can hardly be "professional" now can they Bill?
4) Considering the drawings as "sex objects" is pretty weird Bill. Don't you think?
5) Getting emotionally caught up to the point of being disgusted by a cartoon is also pretty weird Bill.
Besides. I have it on good authority that the imaginary women in this imaginary world, wear these imaginary outfits for imaginary safety (no loose imaginary clothing getting caught in nasty, imaginary machinery) and for imaginary comfort (they're excellent thermal outfits even if imaginary).
What have you drawn lately Bill?
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
