I have a feeling someone tinkered with that video.
I have a feeling someone tinkered with that video.
Could certainly be that too. It's fairly easy to doctor video nowadays.
Yep, especially when all there is to see are a couple of little white shapeless dots with zero surface details to aid in further identification.
FAKE UFO 
My favorite fake UFO was this one:
http://twistedsifter.com/2015/04/richard-branson-london-ufo-april-fools-prank-1989/
A book I wish existed.
A SKEPTIC'S GUIDE TO CAMERA ARTIFACTS
There would be talk about how orbs are digital blooming--how a shutter iris actually can throw a disk image--how to spot photoshop.
All cameras have artifacts.
Branson's craft--while not an ET---does at least have the distinction of being an actual disk shaped object in the sky.
There is a "heaviness" to the image. Same here:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/incredible-close-up-footage-boeing-10708372
So the book would describe the difference between a fake image, and a real object.
Thus--if any future UFO photo's pass the same test and have the same characteristics as the balloon..then you know you have something
http://twistedsifter.com/2015/04/richard-branson-london-ufo-april-fools-prank-1989/
A book I wish existed.
A SKEPTIC'S GUIDE TO CAMERA ARTIFACTS
There would be talk about how orbs are digital blooming--how a shutter iris actually can throw a disk image--how to spot photoshop.
All cameras have artifacts.
Branson's craft--while not an ET---does at least have the distinction of being an actual disk shaped object in the sky.
There is a "heaviness" to the image. Same here:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/incredible-close-up-footage-boeing-10708372
So the book would describe the difference between a fake image, and a real object.
Thus--if any future UFO photo's pass the same test and have the same characteristics as the balloon..then you know you have something
Last edited: