I thought he was just trying to say something polite...and not very convincingly.
I agree, my post was just a poor attempt at humor.

I thought he was just trying to say something polite...and not very convincingly.
I think the episode would've worked better with someone else as the romantic lead, such as Geordie.
Geordi was being sort of a jerk to Scotty, being short tempered and rude. So we hope it's an out of character moment, unless Geordi is usually that way?
Geordi had a job to do and Scotty was getting in the way of it. Scotty would of course call it tinkering, but to tinker with high tech equipment, you first have to understand them (at least if you're not looking to create a new crater or something). The manual Scotty wrote was pushing a hundred years since it had been written, and technology had changed. Geordi had his responsibilities as Chief Engineer, and they didn't include handholding Scotty through getting up to date.
Scotty was doing exactly the same thing he hated about outsiders showing up in his engine room - he was MEDDLING. Geordi had a similar reaction to how Scotty would have handled it, which is to try to be patient until finally he had to throw Scotty out because of him getting in the way.
The TNG bridge crew could be a bitchy little clique from time to time. Things like "Broccoli", and their whiny reactions to having a new captain "be mean to them" (Read: Orders them to do their jobs) in Chain of Command.
I always found it out of character that everyone was so accepting of calling Barclay 'Broccoli'. Especially when they were called out on it and still didn't seem all that contrite. Wesley and Riker had their moments of jerkassery, but I'd always had the impression that was either unintentional by the writers or meant to be one-off occurrences of temper. Having it be part of their characterisation that they'd keep up a campaign of immature (and not even particularly clever) name-calling for months is weird.
It was just odd to see that Picard and Data were the only ones who went 'Seriously? I know he's frustrating, but how old are you people?'
I always found it out of character that everyone was so accepting of calling Barclay 'Broccoli'. Especially when they were called out on it and still didn't seem all that contrite. Wesley and Riker had their moments of jerkassery, but I'd always had the impression that was either unintentional by the writers or meant to be one-off occurrences of temper. Having it be part of their characterisation that they'd keep up a campaign of immature (and not even particularly clever) name-calling for months is weird.
It was just odd to see that Picard and Data were the only ones who went 'Seriously? I know he's frustrating, but how old are you people?'
I always found it out of character that everyone was so accepting of calling Barclay 'Broccoli'. Especially when they were called out on it and still didn't seem all that contrite. Wesley and Riker had their moments of jerkassery, but I'd always had the impression that was either unintentional by the writers or meant to be one-off occurrences of temper. Having it be part of their characterisation that they'd keep up a campaign of immature (and not even particularly clever) name-calling for months is weird.
It was just odd to see that Picard and Data were the only ones who went 'Seriously? I know he's frustrating, but how old are you people?'
The TNG bridge crew could be a bitchy little clique from time to time. Things like "Broccoli", and their whiny reactions to having a new captain "be mean to them" (Read: Orders them to do their jobs) in Chain of Command.
"The Neutral Zone" is a good example. Riker has no interest at all in a spaceship floating past him and is content to let it fly into destruction. Picard is genuinely annoyed that Data recovered people in stasis. "They were already dead."
Watching it, I just kept thinking "who are these people?"
.
(Hell, Picard even objects to reviving them in the first place.)
Is it out-of-character if they're from a parallel Universe?
"The Neutral Zone" is a good example. Riker has no interest at all in a spaceship floating past him and is content to let it fly into destruction. Picard is genuinely annoyed that Data recovered people in stasis. "They were already dead."
Watching it, I just kept thinking "who are these people?"
Apparently the script was a first draft and the writer's strike prevented a second.
How about in "Where Silence Has Lease?" Worf wasn't terribly defined yet, so they have him go all Wolverine psycho on Riker while in their Danger Room session.
Is it out-of-character if they're from a parallel Universe?
At least in some parallel universes (e.g. the mirror universe) they are different personalities, so I'd see them essentially as different characters. Perhaps it would be wise to do so, too, for parallel realities that are a lot 'closer' to our own, because where would you have to draw the dividing line? It's easy to see the Rikers in the 2 universes with the chocolate cake and the yellow cake as essentially the same person (if there are no other differences), but is the Riker that has been captain for 4 years after Picards still the same person? Or the desparate Borg-infested Alpha Quadrant Riker? At the very least, I'd argue that Thomas Riker (whom one could interpret as an alt-universe Riker, in the sense that it 'is' Riker until a certain branching point in history) is a different person ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.