I can appreciate both.
The new stuff is pretty good, and I also like the old stuff too.
However, so long as TOS doesn't start getting "Star Wars'd" over and over again and then have the originals wiped from the face of the planet, it's all good.
Which brings me to the question: Are those new blu-rays (the ones showing on the front page for today - 9/11/14) going to have the original as well as the remastered versions?
Your question is based on a false distinction between "remastered" and what you call "original" versions. The blurays feature the original FX as well as the new FX, but whether you watch with old FX or new, it's all been remastered in HD. The remastering was complete before new FX were added. The remastering and the new FX are two different things.Which brings me to the question: Are those new blu-rays (the ones showing on the front page for today - 9/11/14) going to have the original as well as the remastered versions?
I expected to be generally angry about the New Effects, but somehow when I saw them they were generally fine to me. I'm not sure why; generally, I dislike revising works of art once they're published, at least in a reasonably canonical form. But the new effects felt, overall, right. I think it's that so many of them were pretty good about maintaining the original compositions and style; the ones I like least are the most divergent from Late 60s TV Style effects. I think it also helped that for stock footage, like, Enterprise Orbits The Planet, they would generally diverge to new angles or new compositions only for when the stock footage was repeated within an episode.
Of course that also kind of underlined how few effects the Original Trek actually had, compared to modern SF shows. When there's less than a minute of replaced footage and most of that is stock shots of Enterprise Is In Space or Enterprise Orbits A Planet it's shocking how much they did with so little.
Those of you who, like me, do not like CGI Enterprise:
Do the benefits (planets, exteriors, Stratos, etc.) outweigh the drawback of the Enterprise? I'm really asking, cuz I could watch new fx on Netflix versions instead of my beloved clamshell DVDs for a while.
You ninja'd me!. . .My biggest issue is that they look like they're constantly bouncing a spotlight off the Enterprise.
If they'd lit the models to be more consistent with the rest of the photography on the show then I'd have fewer complaints... that and had they not attempted some of the wrongheaded and ridiculous ship movements in some episodes (I'm looking at you Klingon ship in, "Elaan of Troyius").
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.