Demolishing old cars, maybe.He liked old cars and bikes.
Demolishing old cars, maybe.He liked old cars and bikes.
That was an accident. He liked driving them...fast! Not his fault someone put a quarry in his path.Demolishing old cars, maybe.
I can't see that was Autism that they wanted to portray as it was not an "apple in anyone's eye yet." I think it was more a reverse Spock they wanted. Each series always had something to do with understanding humans and emotion. I feel with Voyager its Tuvok and the Doctor and with DS9 it was Odo. It's just something - a trend, that ST liked to explore. That would be closer to Barclay, and it makes sense since they based him off of some fans they knew. Not sure they liked it too much. True story. And Barclay actually had MI so they did not need an allegory. But whatever humanizes Data more to others. Have no problem. Also, feel the crew was acting very archaic (About "Broccoli') about that especially with Troi on board but she was usually there just to be a Psi. Even back then people were more enlightened. I mean Data was also awkward. But as soon as he got emotions and it was not perfect, I noticed Picard becoming short with him. *Shrugs*I think Data as a character was inspired by people who have troubles with the expression of feelings and social interaction, like for example people on the autism spectrum.
As others have pointed out, especially in the earlier seasons, it often appeared like Data has feelings, just isn't really aware of it and has problems expressing them socially.
So I find the comparison to replicators and chatbots a bit harsh ... after all, it was established Data is much more than a machine.
That said, the episode aims at laughs, but isn't really funny enough, imo. I don't mind the play (?) with stereotypes, but although I like Data, the episode doesn't resonate with me and I often skipped it when rewatching. Maybe, among other reasons, because I didn't like how Jenna was written.
Damn Apple Maps updates.That was an accident. He liked driving them...fast! Not his fault someone put a quarry in his path.![]()
Or in "Half a Life", with Lwaxanna's boyfriend choosing death at the end. It's just a cop-out.
But why? Data tried to be a father in "The Offspring". It's been a constant of his character that he struggles to be more human, or to experience things as humans do. So why is this different? He had a memento of Tasha, so it's not really like he's completely unemotional. The characters say that, himself included, but reading between the lines it's obviously not true, not at a deep level anyway.I don't think either Data or Jenna were in the wrong. I think the advice and changing subroutines by Data is a massive misunderstanding of his character at that point and doesn't serve either character well.
Yeah, but it was a big part of Lwaxanna's character to flirt with Picard for comedic effect, or use her in these manhunting plots. The writers probably didn't want to lose the opportunity to keep doing that, just in case.If she had gotten re-married/ started a long term relationship, that wouldn't have been a problem. Quark's mom and the Nagus got together, and they probably appeared about as often as she did.
That's why I said the writing was a disserviceBut why? Data tried to be a father in "The Offspring". It's been a constant of his character that he struggles to be more human, or to experience things as humans do. So why is this different? He had a memento of Tasha, so it's not really like he's completely unemotional. The characters say that, himself included, but reading between the lines it's obviously not true, not at a deep level anyway.
"HONEY I'M HOME!"
In this episode, Data is trying to perfect romantic subroutines for his relationship with Lieutenant Jr. Jenna D'Sora. And, for some reason, she thinks it's a great idea to act like a stereotype of a 1950s American husband returning to her suburban home where his suburban wife is waiting for him.
Now Real Life reasons why he acts in this way are clear: the writers thought it was hilarious to have Data act like he was an "I Love Lucy" character.
In-Universe, it makes absolutely no sense because:
- Why the hell would Data think that the typical behavior of a 400-year-old culture, which lasted only a decade, in a single geographic area of the Earth, would have been the best choice in this situation? So why not behave like the Pilgrims just landed from the Mayflower? Or an 18th century caliph? Or simply, as a normal and well-adjusted modern human being?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.