Season one finale title revealed:
http://twitter.com/#!/AdamHorowitzLA/status/182252164754849794: A Land Without Magic
Is Rumpelstiltskin channeling his inner Darth Plageuis which would make Emma Anakin...?![]()
What killed Heroes after season 1 was poor writing--incoherent storylines, giving us one plot point then discarding it and moving onto the next(esp in S3) without developing them, lame villians, plotholes, lapses in logic, timidity in shaking up the status quo, treating the characters as plot devices being jerked around by fickle writers.
The poor writing part is subjective, but it does support what I said earlier - that for whatever reason enough viewers decided the show had "lost the plot" for lack of a better term that they started to abandon it.
Heroes was the most objective case of being subjectively bad that I've ever seen. There were plenty of inarguable aspects of bad writing on display that didn't come down to matters of taste. They were things I've actually seen described in basic fiction writing textbooks, examples of things you shouldn't do unless you're trying to churn out absolute crap. It's like they picked up the book and did everything they weren't supposed to do.
Viewers abandoned it because the writing was atrocious. That show actually hung onto its audience longer than it deserved. I've seen plenty of better written shows that were cancelled much faster.
The fortunate part is OUAT has attracted and kept enough viewers who aren't demanding a weekly resolution and are happy with bits and pieces of the story being filled in over multiple weeks (thank you, Lost). For example, I have no doubt that we'll learn why Mr. Gold has the limp. But it may be something we won't find out about until next season - was it an injury received while as Rumple, or did something happen soon after Storybrooke was created? In fact there's a whole storyline that hasn't been explored yet - we have yet to see what happened in the early days of Storybrooke. Did it arrive fully formed, or did Regina spend time molding everyone into their characters?OUAT is Shakespeare compared with Heroes. I haven't noticed much in the way of egregious bad writing. The big cast and loosey-goosey structure (for example: what's the main conflict, Emma vs Regina over Henry or Snow vs Regina over whatever happened in their past?) does sap some of the narrative drive, but to tighten it up would require paring things down, and that would give them less "stuff" to fill up episodes with. Considering that they're not a 13-episode cable series, they're doing just fine.
^You bring up an interesting point regarding Gold/Rumpy. He has the limp as disgraced villager. Doesn't have it as Rumpy. And has it again as Mr. Gold.
What excellent Japanese subplot? I don't remember anything from S2 that I'd call "excellent." That samurai stuff was a bore. And the exploration of Sylar's personalities was a total catastrophic mess. They never did figure out what the character was all about, so they just jerked him around incoherently, trying to create stuff for him to do to fill up the required airtime.Just to specify, I'm referring more to the excellent Japanese subplot from Season 2, and the exploration of Sylar's different personalities.
What was there to be patient about? I stuck with the show the whole time and it never rewarded my patience. It just got worse and worse. The people who bailed early were the smart ones. I only kept watching because I can be psychotically stubborn.The audience just got impatient.
What excellent Japanese subplot? I don't remember anything from S2 that I'd call "excellent." That samurai stuff was a bore. And the exploration of Sylar's personalities was a total catastrophic mess. They never did figure out what the character was all about, so they just jerked him around incoherently, trying to create stuff for him to do to fill up the required airtime.Just to specify, I'm referring more to the excellent Japanese subplot from Season 2, and the exploration of Sylar's different personalities.
It was obvious that the original plan was never to keep Sylar after S1 because they hadn't laid the groundwork for a character that could survive much scrutiny. Zachary Quinto's great performance screwed up that plan, so they were left with a great actor playing an unworkable character.
Good to hear. I coulda sworn that decision was made before the break, so, it's good to hear it's made nowOUAT is on the verge of renewal for S2. Not surprising but official.
I liked the characters but I always felt that Heroes' first season appeal was the plotlines and mysteries. A large part of the characters' roles were simply being exposition-dumpers and action figures--with such a large cast and frenetic pacing from one scene to the next we had little time to spend on them. And I felt their arcs were done by the end of season one and the fact that Kring kept them around is what partially contributed to the weak writing--he simply had no interest or longterm plans for them since he was going to rotate out the cast.That would have been a huge mistake, since the characters were the show's strength, largely because they were played by good actors, or so-so actors who were at least cast well for the part and had good on-screen chemistry.
I don't know if I'd call The 4400 a failed Lost wanabe, first off it started before Lost, and it ran for four years. Not to mention the fact that the whole style of it was not at all similar to the kind of feel the Lost imitators tend to go for.I liked the characters but I always felt that Heroes' first season appeal was the plotlines and mysteries. A large part of the characters' roles were simply being exposition-dumpers and action figures--with such a large cast and frenetic pacing from one scene to the next we had little time to spend on them. And I felt their arcs were done by the end of season one and the fact that Kring kept them around is what partially contributed to the weak writing--he simply had no interest or longterm plans for them since he was going to rotate out the cast.That would have been a huge mistake, since the characters were the show's strength, largely because they were played by good actors, or so-so actors who were at least cast well for the part and had good on-screen chemistry.
That's actually one of the things I hate about a lot of shows these days with fast pacing and a large cast--you don't get the extended scenes and the same characters week in and week out that a more leisure paced drama with a modest ensemble allows for. I would love tv shows in the future to go back to this and not tie themselves down with ADD pacing, flashcutting between scenes and an expansive cast. They could also get rid of complicated mythologies opting instead for more manageable season long arcs where the mysteries and unanswered questions don't need to be drawn out for the life of the series.
I mean just look at all the failed LOST wannabes--Harpers Island, Invasion, Surface, post S1 Heroes, Alcatraz, FlashForward, The Event, The 4400, V etc.
I'm on board for that.I would love tv shows in the future to go back to this and not tie themselves down with ADD pacing, flashcutting between scenes and an expansive cast. They could also get rid of complicated mythologies opting instead for more manageable season long arcs where the mysteries and unanswered questions don't need to be drawn out for the life of the series.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.