If they did something like this for the new movie Enterprise I'd get in in a flash. But for the 1701-D? Been there, done that. Technical manuals, floorplans, the Fact Files... I've had more than enough for one lifetime.
^ Pretty much my take too.

If they did something like this for the new movie Enterprise I'd get in in a flash. But for the 1701-D? Been there, done that. Technical manuals, floorplans, the Fact Files... I've had more than enough for one lifetime.
Can you provide a review of the contents of both the book and the CD? I'm curious as to why they went the route of recreating everything in CG rather than use the source images used in the interactive technical manual (at least in part).
I think the problem is those images were only at a 640X480 resolution, and wouldn't be quite the size or HD quality we're used to now.
Not to mention licensing. Simon & Schuster probably still have copyright on the old stuff.
Why?
Why?
HD. I'm pretty sure those panoramas from the 90s were low-res quicktime.
Why?
HD. I'm pretty sure those panoramas from the 90s were low-res quicktime.
Low-res real sets versus high-res fake sets... Doesn't really count as new content, does it?
Use CGI to show us what we didn't see and what didn't exist. The main shuttlebay, Cetacean Ops, the malls and lounges that Probert envisioned, etc.
Recreating in CGI only what we've seen before and existed in real life is unforgivable. We had this with the Interactive Technical Manual -- the exam same sets -- because they had real photography of the actual sets. Now they are doing the same thing with CGI replicas. Why? Use CGI to show us what we didn't see and what didn't exist. The main shuttlebay, Cetacean Ops, the malls and lounges that Probert envisioned, etc.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.