That was never actually supposed to happen in Disco, it was just an internet rumor that gained traction.
Ok. What is the chance of a Picard spinoff?
- Thread starter ELCHawk
- Start date
One more of these, just to get your take, then I'm done.
Let's go for the gold!
15 years ago, but how about it? And forget about even nostalgia. Do you, someone who -- like me -- is also on the Generation X / Millennial cusp, think of this as retro? Is it "old school" to you?
I think it’s not really my generation of music (even though I do appreciate Gaga). But I don’t think it’s the current generation’s music either.
But that’s a little goal post shifting. We’re talking about nostalgia. Nostalgia is a feeling. Not an era or specific time period of entertainment. Those are two very different things.
Pretty much any music from the early 2000s onwards all mushes together. Most music you're bound to run into in (generalist!) bars and restaurants reflects this played on shuffle. And hell, even 80s and 90s rock has massive staying power in South America and southern Europe. Pull out Shazam and a song that might be new to you turns out to be over 30 years old.
Ugh. No.
Michelle Hurd seems to think she'd be involved with Legacy.
Picard's Michelle Hurd on Star Trek's Legacy and Where Raffi Could Go Next - IGN
Michelle Hurd, the actress who played Raffi on Star Trek: Picard, spoke to IGN ahead of ST-SF: Trek to San Francisco about where she hopes her character goes next, Star Trek's legacy and how it changed her life, and much more.www.ign.com
Dave Blass has said he'd like to upgrade the Enterprise-G if Legacy is greenlit.
Star Trek: Legacy's New Enterprise May Be Slightly Different If Series Happens [Updated]
Another good reason to greenlight Star Trek: Legacy.screenrant.com
Todd Stashwich seems pretty convinced Shaw will be revived in some way if Legacy happens.
Interview: Michelle Hurd And Todd Stashwick Talk ‘Star Trek: Legacy’ Dreams And ‘Picard’ Memes
TrekMovie spoke to the actors at the Saturn Awards.trekmovie.com
I don't think Michelle Hurd, Dave Blass, and Todd Stashwich would be so far off-base with Terry Matalas.
As far as Jeri Ryan herself, she's onboard if Legacy was greenlit.
Interview: Jeri Ryan On Taking Seven From Borg To Bi Captain Of The Enterprise To ‘Star Trek: Legacy’
TrekMovie talked to the 'Voyager' and 'Picard' actress at the Saturn Awards.
All this leads me to believe Legacy would feature Captain Seven and the Enterprise-G crew.
Beat TPTB over the head with enough memes and they'll come around!
Last edited:
So, the wife and I went and saw Inside Out 2 a few weeks ago. She really loved the first one and the second certainly was pretty good for a kids movie. Very minor spoilers will follow.
If you’re not familiar with the series, it’s the story of a girl, Riley, and her emotions. The sequels adds some new emotions as she enters puberty, including a cameo by the emotion of nostalgia.
That's the correct answer. And I say this as someone who likes the song.
The irony of it all is TNG was freer from connections to TOS purely because Gene wanted to avoid having to pay royalties to his ex-wife who partly owned the original show after the divorce.
Look, I tried to be pretty diplomatic when I started posting on this BBS in 2022. People would ask why I didn't like, say, SNW, and I'd actually try to explain why, like some poor effective altruist not appreciating the depths people will go to to be assholes on the Internet. "Hijacking the thread" -- according to the sea lions. So I'm far less likely to devote any length of time to elaborate on something now.
That said, one thing this thread demonstrates is that people are fans of Star Trek for very different reasons. Back in the day, most hard core fans seemed to be of the continuity/lore variety. There are clearly other types here who spend far far more time talking about Star Trek online than I'm ever willing to put in. If you like a reboot like SNW, more power to you. Just expect that a massive portion of the fanbase wants something else, like a continuation that moves forward 21 years worth of storylines.
That said, one thing this thread demonstrates is that people are fans of Star Trek for very different reasons. Back in the day, most hard core fans seemed to be of the continuity/lore variety. There are clearly other types here who spend far far more time talking about Star Trek online than I'm ever willing to put in. If you like a reboot like SNW, more power to you. Just expect that a massive portion of the fanbase wants something else, like a continuation that moves forward 21 years worth of storylines.
Last edited:
I don't think it's far enough in the past yet. NDAs and all of that. More than half the book is about his life before TNG. I actually like that. We know a lot of about his time on TNG and the making of TNG. His life before Star Trek, especially with the Royal Shakespear Company, I didn't know anywhere near as much about.
Although there were a few surprises reading about his time during TNG that I didn't know about before. Like Patrick Stewart's affair with Jennifer Hetrick. Reading about it in Making It So was the first time I ever heard about it.
Last edited:
Yeah I read the PICARD portion the same day I picked up the Titan (Publishing) art/making of the series coffee table book. Both are definitely scrubbed of any particularities. And what little details are offered seem to conflict between the two books. I'm looking forward to when a Mark Altman 50 Year Mission type book comes out to cover this latest era. What we know about must just be the tip of the iceberg.
How did you discover that? I read it in "Star Trek: Designing Starships Volume 4: Discovery”. A quote from John Eaves
Maybe the real Picard season 3 was the confusion we found along the way?
When it comes to Legacy, I'll have to put on my Poker Face.
That's more Season 2.
Wasn't that the name of a Voyager episode?Wasn't that revulsion?
(I'm kidding P2 fans, just kidding)
"You think like an Organic!!!"
The same John Eaves who has been known to supply incorrect information, like the whole 25% fiasco? The same John Eaves who had to temporarily shut down his social media accounts by request of Paramount because he was frequently posting inaccurate information?
Well, shit me, horsey. If that John Eaves said it, then what do I know?
When I watch Trek on TV, I want new things to happen. While some of the Kurtzman stuff isn't "bad", I want more from Trek than simple nostalgia pandering. If I want to relive Trek's greatest hits, I have shelves full of DVDs, Blu-rays and assorted novels and comics.
I don't find the children of main characters in any way interesting.
I don't find the children of main characters in any way interesting.
Similar threads
