Seemingly confirmed...
https://www.newsarama.com/46673-ewa...Ai_XXdjWaUPvqS0EoArLQmIHhHD_5UI7oou9uQuEeDX6M
https://www.newsarama.com/46673-ewa...Ai_XXdjWaUPvqS0EoArLQmIHhHD_5UI7oou9uQuEeDX6M
I doubt it.Will A’Sharard Hett be in it?
I compared it generally to Discovery, cramming into the cracks of a franchise past versus moving forward.
Could they do a great Kenobi show? Sure, I'll absolutely give it a try. I'm usually pretty honest about posting what I think, even if my earlier thoughts end up being wrong. I loved Solo. I hated Rogue One. At the same time, yet another franchise is taking the easy way out to garner eyeballs. Hanging everything on nostalgia instead of pressing forward.
I understand it is all about making money, I'd probably make the same business decision. But, as a fan? I find it frustrating they constantly rely on the past versus doing something new in the setting. What's next? A riff on Saved by the Bell, with Princess Leia and her friends in high school?
Ewan McGregor, who played Obi-Wan Kenobi, electrified the audience when he emerged following the announcement of his involvement in a new series taking place eight years after the events of Revenge of the Sith, where we last saw Obi-Wan delivering the infant Luke Skywalker to his Tatooine homestead.
Because it would be awesome. Do we need another reason?Why would Maul appear? We've already seen how that relationship pans out and it left zero room for further stories between the two of them.
So that’s before Solo correct? which was 10 years after.The show takes place 8 years after Revenge of the Sith:
https://www.starwars.com/news/the-galaxy-far-far-away-just-got-a-little-bigger
So that’s before Solo correct? which was 10 years after.
WHY NOT BOTHGlad its going to be a series now and not a movie.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.