Kate!!!!! Really???? You don't care for these at all???!!!???
Why, no. I don't. ::she said with quiet assurance::
One of my sisters not only uses multiple exclamation points and question marks and, of course, smilies, but she also uses caps and underlines and italics and boldface and different fonts and fonts of a different color (which is like a horse of a different color but a lot more annoying, graphically speaking), and she uses
alllllllllll of this stuff in the same email, sometimes the same paragraph, and maybe even (though I won't swear to this) the same sentence.
She's just as sweet as she can be, but her emails look as though they were written by someone in serious need of some lithium, or perhaps padded restraints.
However, even the most insane-looking emails from my dear sister don't bother me nearly as much as when some in-laws, who are also just as sweet as they can be, don't know how to pluralize their
very own last name. I mean, I know it ends with an "e," but still, what's so dang hard about just adding an "s"? Why write it
Joyce's when
Joyces is(name changed to protect the guilty) correct and incidentally prevents you from looking like an ignoramous? Why? Why? Why?
I'd better stop before somebody suggests that I need some padded restraints. Besides, in this thread, I know I'm preaching to the choir.
Christopher said:
Actually "career" as a verb doesn't have the same meaning as "careen," though they're close enough that they're often used interchangeably. To careen is to tilt to one side, sway back and forth, or move rapidly and erratically. To career is to make rapid forward progress, to race ahead at high speed. It is possible to careen while you career, but you can do them separately too. A drunk staggering back and forth is careening, but definitely not careering. A bullet train roaring down a straight track is careering but not careening.
This is exactly how I differentiate between these two words as well. Oh, and I agree with
Sakrysta about
infer and
imply, too.
Also, when you ask a question, why not use a question mark? Isn't that what they're for?
Some playwrights end questions in their scripts with a period. Octavio Solis is fond of this. For example, it'll be written something like this:
Kate: Also, when you ask a question, why not use a quotation mark.
Me: Isn't that what they're for.
It's done to inform the actor, iirc, to say the lines as a statement rather than a question, so as to give them a different, flatter intonation.
Yes, I realize there are specific instances, such as dialogue, when there is a good reason to not use a question mark. But I'm just saying that when somebody asks a question on - to pull a random example right out of my head (yeah, right

) - a Trek bulletin board, that person should use a question mark. You know. To show that it's a question, not a statement.