The Enterprise-D was too comfy.
But DS9 wasn't comfy enough!
I grew up in the era of TNG and that was my series. I did not see DS9 until recently, because it was hard to get into. I saw VOY and ENT, and the decline of Star Trek. And coming out of the TNG era, I fell in love with TOS. It was different, it had been neglected when everything was Picard and Borg, and it satiated some hipster moods. It was the original which had been ignored, criticized or pushed to the side for too long in Star Trek fandom and culture, which needed to be revered and defended. So I became a TOShead.
However, things changed and it is all going back to the Original Star Trek, with the TNG era beginning to feel pushed to the side. The movie series was a reboot of the Original Series, the new TV series is circa TOS, merchandising is back to the Original Star Trek. Even the Star Trek font found on products is the TOS Star Trek font again. And in this era, I find myself nostalgic for the 24th century. Am I the only one?
The Motion Picture era was also a key part of that 90s TNG golden age era. The Star Trek of the moment was the Next Generation, but when you thought of Star Trek as the megalithic legendary tome, it was people in red military uniforms. If there were a comic book about Kirk and crew, or a video game, it was going to be mostly them during the TWOK uniform era. That's where the bookmark was left on Kirk, so that was Captain Kirk. So that is a big part of the nostalgia as well.
Maybe someday the balance may tip back to TNG. Saban is now cashing in on my generation's nostalgia for Mighty Morphin Power Rangers through toys, comics and a movie. The Kelvin Timeline comics still uses TNG elements too.
Maybe so, but I doubt that will stop them from trying.I'm not sure about a rebooted TNG-it's too cerebral and was often not that movie esque so I'm not sure if they'd trash it or not.
The problem is that TNG is a sequel, so it is difficult to reboot. Unless you do it as a fresh reboot to the original series, a sequel to the Kelvin film series, or completely throw out TOS and make this step one in a totally new Star Trek universe. All have their own awkwardness.
The problem is that TNG is a sequel, so it is difficult to reboot. Unless you do it as a fresh reboot to the original series, a sequel to the Kelvin film series, or completely throw out TOS and make this step one in a totally new Star Trek universe. All have their own awkwardness.
You mean like truth serum, esper ratings and Klingon mind probes?Either they'd embrace everything they've learned (transwarp beaming, commbage-sized transporters, Borg nanites curing death, godmode armour etc) and it'd be a very different Trek, or they'd sweep all that under the rug and it'd be exactly the same as every other series.
Oddly the title of this thread makes me wonder what is considered nostalgia in the 24th century? We see a little of that with Dax on the old USS Enterprise and various trips to the holosuite and holodecks for other character.
Honestly, I think the third option is easy and not all that awkward. Just start a new STAR TREK series featuring the U.S.S. Enterprise in the 24th Century, featuring new versions of Picard, Data, Troi, etc. Hell, throw in Seven of Nine if you feel like it. No need to provide any sort of in-universe explanation regarding alternate timelines or whatever. Just reboot it the way you would Spider-Man or Power Rangers.
If you want, you can occasionally throw in an Easter Egg reference to a legendary Captain Kirk of years gone by, but you wouldn't have to pin it down to specifically to the Prime Kirk or the Kelvin Kirk or TOS or anything like that. You would just have a new Star Trek series, whose history includes a version of Kirk and Spock and Pike, etc.
The title is a problem, though. You'd probably want to ditch the "Next Generation" bit and just call it it STAR TREK, which is what the TNG movies did anyway. It wasn't STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION: FIRST CONTACT after all.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.