Samuel T. Cogley said:
Plum said:
^^^
Stan Lee is a businessman... he never wrote in any way but the "marvel method". Comparing a successful writer, director, and artist like Leonard Nimoy to Stan Lee is silly.
But the concept is still sound.
I think they have all lost their perspective and are not doing Trek justice with this half assed approach.
Sec31Mike said:
It's not his senility that I consider his drive for this film. I think he's feeling kinda out of it, and wants another Hoorah in Trek. I do think they offered him some serious money to sign on.
I watched the Comic-Con footage and he didn't seem to enthusiastic about the film. He really didn't say much at all.
Sec31Mike said:
I will reiterate my disgust at Paramount's treatment of Trek at their comic-con panel.
9 minutes out of 2 hours was plainly an insult to the fans.
After a year of announcements on the startrek.com site, that is all they could come up with. Casting Zachary Quinto is not something that took an entire year.
In the meanwhile JJ has had time to make "Cloverfield", did they think we wouldn't notice that Trek isn't JJs priority.
I myself have nothing against Spock showing up in a new Trek film. Nimoy's involvement I think is a plus. I do think that this film is going to be Spock-centric.
Sec31Mike said:
I will reiterate my disgust at Paramount's treatment of Trek at their comic-con panel.
9 minutes out of 2 hours was plainly an insult to the fans.
After a year of announcements on the startrek.com site, that is all they could come up with. Casting Zachary Quinto is not something that took an entire year.
In the meanwhile JJ has had time to make "Cloverfield", did they think we wouldn't notice that Trek isn't JJs priority.
I myself have nothing against Spock showing up in a new Trek film. Nimoy's involvement I think is a plus. I do think that this film is going to be Spock-centric.
UWC Defiance said:
Aragorn said:
^ Okay, you're definitely the new Stewey now.
Uh, not even close.![]()
Plum said:
^^^
Well, I'd wonder what difference it made for you. Don't let negative feelings get ya down. Everything is fine. Oh man, I sound like Berman now.
UWC Defiance said:
Aragorn said:
^ Okay, you're definitely the new Stewey now.
Uh, not even close.![]()
Oh yea, I miss Stewey. He was dedicated.
Noname Given said:
Sec31Mike said:
I will reiterate my disgust at Paramount's treatment of Trek at their comic-con panel.
9 minutes out of 2 hours was plainly an insult to the fans.
After a year of announcements on the startrek.com site, that is all they could come up with. Casting Zachary Quinto is not something that took an entire year.
In the meanwhile JJ has had time to make "Cloverfield", did they think we wouldn't notice that Trek isn't JJs priority.
I myself have nothing against Spock showing up in a new Trek film. Nimoy's involvement I think is a plus. I do think that this film is going to be Spock-centric.
OMG - the sacrilige - JJ Abrams is doing more than one project at once, the horor. You do realize that principal shooting on a film like this takes maybe 6 weeks, right? the rest is post poduction, etc. And JJ ABrhams is directing this (it WAS up in the air as to whether he was going to actually direct it himself, or let someone else do it - but he's a Star Trek fan, and wanted to take the helm.
And, as someone said, what did you expect? Paramount to be handing out copies of the shooting script or something? If anything, these days I wonder how ANY film is a success because with the way the internet works these days, EVERY aspect of a film is leaked in some way before teh thing ever hits the screens.
Back in the 'old days' (ie the ST:TMP film series era); I used to PURPOSELY AVOID any leaks because this was actual NEW Star Trek and I wanted to be surprised and be able to see a new filmed Star Trek story and be surprised (hell at that point I'd seen every Star Trek episode 20+ times).
In fact it's because of eople like you that th Star Trek film franchise probably became what it did. The producers and writers couldn't just worry about coming up with a compelling story and film; the fan focus groups SHOWED what the 'fans' needed to be in a Star Trek film; so the producers were obliged to add in EVERYTHING the fan focus groups showed.
I'd be happy if they were able to keep the WHOLE PROJECT under a tight lid; and let the the theatre preview and comercial advertising sell you on whether you want to go and see the film or not. NOT the leaked first draft of a script taht has been torn to pieces by internet nerds who have nothing better to do then obsess over the fact that the ONE element (and it's different for each such nerd) that MAKES Star Trek (in their opinion) in missing, thus teh production team are talentless hacks, just in it for the money and out to rape GR's vision. Hell, some people already think the film is sacrilige because there isn't a part for William Shatner.
See th movie or don't. in the long run, your $10.00 won't make much of a difference.
TiberiusK said:
That is why I've stopped reading certain sites. They grab on any internet rumor, while spoiling the details for others. It would have been much more exciting to learn, for the first time at ComicCon, that Nimoy and Quinto would be in the film. It's one thing to read rumors that turn out to be true. It's much better to drop your jaw as Leonard Nimoy walks onstage.
Sec31Mike said:
I will reiterate my disgust at Paramount's treatment of Trek at their comic-con panel.
9 minutes out of 2 hours was plainly an insult to the fans.
jon1701 said:
BACKSTAGE AT COMIC CON
Abrams "Hmm, I wonder how I can insult the fans?"
Nimoy "Give the fuckers 9 minutes. Not a minute more. That'll show them"
Abrams (laughing) "The bastards. Hopefully they will reiterate their disgust in a thread a couple of days down the line"
Nimoy "Sounds good to me"
Abrams and Nimoy cackle loudly and sweep onto stage in dramatic uplighting with foreboding music...dum, dum, dum dummmm....
You're really reaching to find something to complain about, aren't you? Can't you find something to be positive about?Sec31Mike said:
I will reiterate my disgust at Paramount's treatment of Trek at their comic-con panel.
9 minutes out of 2 hours was plainly an insult to the fans.
After a year of announcements on the startrek.com site, that is all they could come up with. Casting Zachary Quinto is not something that took an entire year.
In the meanwhile JJ has had time to make "Cloverfield", did they think we wouldn't notice that Trek isn't JJs priority.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.